It is
proposed that this article be deleted because of the following concern:
Autobiographical and heavily promotional slop made by the subject themself sourced (almost, with one small exception) exclusively to primary sources and user-generated (IMDb, likely also primary however) content. Absolutely shameful, and to boot clearly fails notability guidelines. I've cut down on some of the most egregious parts, but I eventually found that there's literally nothing to salvage here and gave up. Users AlexHarz and BionicHollywood, if you're reading this, be aware that if this goes to a deletion discussion and is deleted, the article is not likely to ever be reinstated with your current notability, so you should think carefully about removing the PROD. (proposed by TheTechnician27)
If you can address this concern by improving, copyediting, sourcing, renaming, or merging the page, please edit this page and do so. You may remove this message if you improve the article or otherwise object to deletion for any reason. Although not required, you are encouraged to explain why you object to the deletion, either in your edit summary or on the talk page. If this template is removed, do not replace it.
The article may be deleted if this message remains in place for seven days, i.e., after 18:11, 17 November 2024 (UTC).
If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article so that it is acceptable according to the deletion policy.
Find sources: "Alex Harz" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTORPROD
Expired+%5B%5BWP%3APROD%7CPROD%5D%5D%2C+concern+was%3A+Autobiographical+and+heavily+promotional+slop+made+by+the+subject+themself+sourced+%28almost%2C+with+one+small+exception%29+exclusively+to+primary+sources+and+user-generated+%28IMDb%2C+likely+also+primary+however%29+content.+Absolutely+shameful%2C+and+to+boot+clearly+fails+notability+guidelines.+I%27ve+cut+down+on+some+of+the+most+egregious+parts%2C+but+I+eventually+found+that+there%27s+literally+nothing+to+salvage+here+and+gave+up.+Users+AlexHarz+and+BionicHollywood%2C+if+you%27re+reading+this%2C+be+aware+that+if+this+goes+to+a+deletion+discussion+and+is+deleted%2C+the+article+is+not+likely+to+ever+be+reinstated+with+your+current+notability%2C+so+you+should+think+carefully+about+removing+the+PROD.
Expired [[WP:PROD|prod]], concern was: Autobiographical and heavily promotional slop made by the subject themself sourced (almost, with one small exception) exclusively to primary sources and user-generated (IMDb, likely also primary however) content. Absolutely shameful, and to boot clearly fails notability guidelines. I've cut down on some of the most egregious parts, but I eventually found that there's literally nothing to salvage here and gave up. Users AlexHarz and BionicHollywood, if you're reading this, be aware that if this goes to a deletion discussion and is deleted, the article is not likely to ever be reinstated with your current notability, so you should think carefully about removing the PROD.
