Bennis v. Michigan | |
---|---|
Argued November 29, 1995 Decided March 4, 1996 | |
Full case name | Tina B. Bennis v. Michigan |
Citations | 516 U.S. 442 (more) 116 S. Ct. 994; 134 L. Ed. 2d 68 |
Case history | |
Prior | Mich ex rel. Prosecutor v. Bennis, 447 Mich. 719, 527 N.W.2d 483 (1994) |
Holding | |
The forfeiture order did not offend the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment or the Takings Clause of the Fifth Amendment. | |
Court membership | |
| |
Case opinions | |
Majority | Rehnquist, joined by O'Connor, Scalia, Thomas, Ginsburg |
Concurrence | Thomas |
Concurrence | Ginsburg |
Dissent | Stevens, joined by Souter, Breyer |
Dissent | Kennedy |
Bennis v. Michigan, 516 U.S. 442 (1996), was a decision by the United States Supreme Court, which held that the innocent owner defense is not constitutionally mandated by Fourteenth Amendment Due Process in cases of civil forfeiture.