Benton v. Maryland | |
---|---|
Argued December 12, 1968 Reargued March 24, 1969 Decided June 23, 1969 | |
Full case name | Benton v. Maryland |
Citations | 395 U.S. 784 (more) 89 S. Ct. 2056; 23 L. Ed. 2d 707 |
Case history | |
Prior | 1 Md. App. 647, 232 A.2d 541, vacated and remanded |
Holding | |
The protections against double jeopardy in the Fifth Amendment are incorporated against the states through the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. | |
Court membership | |
| |
Case opinions | |
Majority | Marshall, joined by Warren, Black, Douglas, Brennan |
Concurrence | White |
Dissent | Harlan, joined by Stewart |
Laws applied | |
U.S. Const. amend. V and XIV | |
This case overturned a previous ruling or rulings | |
Palko v. Connecticut (1937) |
Benton v. Maryland, 395 U.S. 784 (1969), is a Supreme Court of the United States decision concerning double jeopardy. Benton ruled that the Double Jeopardy Clause of the Fifth Amendment applies to the states.[1] In doing so, Benton expressly overruled Palko v. Connecticut.[2]