Best value procurement

Best value procurement (BVP) is a procurement method that looks at factors other than only price, such as quality and expertise, when selecting vendors or contractors.[1][2][3]

In a best value system, the value of procured goods or services can be simply described as a comparison of costs and benefits. A contractor or vendor is thus selected through a process of researching the vendors or contractors before a detailed project plan is made.[4]

Although BVP is a new procurement method, it does build on procuring and tendering according to the MEAT principle (most economically advantageous tender). The principle enables the contracting authority to take account of criteria that reflect qualitative, technical and sustainable aspects of the tender submission as well as price when reaching an award decision.[5]

The BVP approach is based on the conviction that minimizing risks or eliminating risks when allocated information is effectively used for a proper choice. This means the more information that is available and the better it is utilized, the better the future can be predicted and the fewer decisions or risks have to be made.[6]

BVP is based upon natural law. Rather than changing and manipulating people, one can understand the nature of transactions which then can be anticipated on using expertise to a maximum, with minimum risks and maximum value as a result.[7]

Typically values are assigned to factors such as price, past performance, schedule, and vision.[8]

These values are tabulated for each potential vendor or contractor and one will come out on top.[4]

  1. ^ "Best-Value Procurement Manual" (PDF). dot.state.mn.us. Minnesota Department of Transportation. 2013-05-02. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2017-08-29. Retrieved 2022-08-24.
  2. ^ Kelleher Jr., Thomas J.; Abernathy IV, Thomas E.; Bell Jr., Hubert J.; Reed, Steven L., eds. (2010). Smith, Currie & Hancock's Federal Government Construction Contracts: A Practical Guide for the Industry Professional. John Wiley & Sons. pp. 89–. ISBN 9780470539767.
  3. ^ The Facility Management Handbook Chapter 23: Operations and Maintenance–Contracting and Types of Contracts. AMACOM Div American Mgmt Assn. pp. 11–. ISBN 9780814430682.
  4. ^ a b "University of Alberta Transforms RFPs from Reactive to Proactive." Archived 2015-02-26 at the Wayback Machine The Legal Edge, n.d. Web. 30 Apr. 2013.
  5. ^ "Most economically advantageous tender (MEAT) | felp". www.felp.ac.uk. Retrieved 2018-05-29.
  6. ^ "The promise of Best Value Procurement: Governance and (in)stability of specifications within an innovative biogas project". Cleaner Production. October 2017 – via Science Direct.
  7. ^ Storteboom, Arnoud; Wondimu, Paulos; Lohne, Jardar; Lædre, Ola (2017-01-01). "Best Value Procurement - The Practical Approach In The Netherlands". Procedia Computer Science. 121: 398–406. doi:10.1016/j.procs.2017.11.054. ISSN 1877-0509.
  8. ^ "PBSRG | Performance Based Studies Research Group". pbsrg.com. Retrieved 2018-05-11.