Commodity Futures Trading Commission v. Schor

This article relies excessively on references to primary sources. Please improve this article by adding secondary or tertiary sources. Find sources: "Commodity Futures Trading Commission v. Schor" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR (November 2019) (Learn how and when to remove this message)

Commodity Futures Trading Commission v. Schor
Supreme Court of the United States
Argued April 29, 1986 Decided July 7, 1986
Full case name	Commodity Futures Trading Commission v. Schor, et al.
Citations	478 U.S. 833 (more) 106 S. Ct. 3245; 92 L. Ed. 2d 675; 1986 U.S. LEXIS 144; 54 U.S.L.W. 5096; Comm. Fut. L. Rep. (CCH) ¶ 23,116
Case history
Prior	Schor v. Commodity Futures Trading Comm'n, 740 F.2d 1262 (D.C. Cir. 1984), cert. granted, judgment vacated, 473 U.S. 922 (1985); on remand, 770 F.2d 211 (D.C. Cir. 1985); cert. granted, 474 U.S. 1018 (1985).
Holding
Congress may grant pendent jurisdiction over state law counterclaims to administrative agencies.
Court membership
Chief Justice Warren E. Burger Associate Justices William J. Brennan Jr. · Byron White Thurgood Marshall · Harry Blackmun Lewis F. Powell Jr. · William Rehnquist John P. Stevens · Sandra Day O'Connor
Case opinions
Majority	O'Connor, joined by Burger, White, Blackmun, Powell, Rehnquist, Stevens
Dissent	Brennan, joined by Marshall
Laws applied
U.S. Const. art. III; 7 U.S.C. § 1-27f

Commodity Futures Trading Commission v. Schor, 478 U.S. 833 (1986), was a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States held an administrative agency may, in some cases, exert jurisdiction over state-law counterclaims.^[1]