Comparison between Ido and Interlingua

This article needs additional citations for verification. Please help improve this article by adding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. Find sources: "Comparison between Ido and Interlingua" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR (September 2007) (Learn how and when to remove this message)

Ido
Language Grammar Phonology Union vs. Esperanto vs. Interlingua vs. Novial
History Beaufront Couturat Jespersen Delegation for the Adoption of an International Auxiliary Language
Related Auxiliary language Constructed language Esperanto Esperantido Adjuvilo
Wikimedia Wikipedio Wikivortaro
v t e

Interlingua
Language Grammar Irregularities UMI
History IALA Alexander Gode André Martinet Vanderbilt Morris
Comparison with Esperanto with Ido
Related topics Auxiliary language Constructed language Esperanto Ido Interlingue Novial Volapük
v t e

Ido and Interlingua are two constructed languages created in the 20th century, Ido circa 1910 and Interlingua circa 1940. Both have had some measure of success, but Interlingua has enjoyed greater diffusion and acceptance by public and private institutions—it is taught in many high schools and universities, for example. Ido was developed by a small committee from Reformed Esperanto, whereas Interlingua was developed from scratch by an American organization, the IALA.

Ido is what is called schematic (easier to learn for speakers of very different languages), whereas Interlingua is what is called naturalistic (easier to understand for speakers of related languages).