Controversial Reddit communities

This article may require cleanup to meet Wikipedia's quality standards. The specific problem is: Full of tags. Please help improve this article if you can. (October 2024) (Learn how and when to remove this message)

This article needs additional citations for verification. Please help improve this article by adding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. Find sources: "Controversial Reddit communities" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR (October 2024) (Learn how and when to remove this message)

On the social news site Reddit, some communities (known as "subreddits" or "subs") are devoted to explicit, violent, propagandist, or hateful material. These subreddits have been the topic of controversy, at times receiving significant media coverage. Journalists, attorneys, media researchers, and others have commented that such communities shape and promote biased views of international politics, the veracity of medical evidence, misogynistic rhetoric, and other disruptive concepts.

The founders of Reddit have claimed they did not intend the platform to be a "bastion of free speech", where even hate speech would be tolerated.^[1] However, for a period of time^[when?], Reddit allowed these controversial communities to operate largely unrestricted.^{[citation needed]} The site's General Manager, Erik Martin, has argued that objectionable material is a consequence of allowing free speech on the site.^{[citation needed]}

Eventually^[when?], Reddit administrators instituted usage rules to allow for the banning of groups and members who stole or exposed personal information/images or promoted illegal activity, violence, shaming, racial or gender hatred, harassment, or extremist speech. Nevertheless, there remain various active and heavily-trafficked subreddits which skirt the edges of the rules.^{[citation needed][example needed]}

Critics^[who?] argue that while concerned Redditors and moderators often report these subs, they often remain open until a specific incident, or the actions of an individual, forces them to come under more intense scrutiny and requires administrators to decide between allowing distasteful content or suppressing dangerous or destructive communities.^{[citation needed]} Critics^[who?] have also charged that the site has been inconsistent in what it bans.^{[citation needed]} Some banned users and communities have created or moved to other platforms, with some even saving a duplicate of their subreddit in order to preserve it elsewhere, in the event it gets banned.^{[citation needed][example needed]}

At least one controversial subreddit was started or maintained by a high-profile user, New Hampshire legislator Robert Fisher.^{[which?][citation needed]}