| Diablo Canyon Power Plant | |
|---|---|
 Diablo Canyon Power Plant | |
 | |
| Country | United States |
| Location | San Luis Obispo County, California |
| Coordinates | 35°12′39″N 120°51′22″W / 35.21083°N 120.85611°W |
| Status | Operational |
| Construction began | Unit 1: April 23, 1968 Unit 2: December 9, 1970 |
| Commission date | Unit 1: May 7, 1985 Unit 2: March 13, 1986 |
| Decommission date | 2030 (planned) |
| Construction cost | $11.556 billion (2007 USD)[1] ($16.4 billion in 2023 dollars[2]) |
| Owner | PG&E Corporation |
| Operator | Pacific Gas and Electric Company |
| Employees | 1,500[3] |
| Nuclear power station | |
| Reactor type | PWR |
| Reactor supplier | Westinghouse |
| Cooling source | Pacific Ocean |
| Thermal capacity | 2 × 3411 MWth |
| Power generation | |
| Units operational | 1 × 1138 MW 1 × 1118 MW |
| Make and model | WH 4-loop (DRYAMB) |
| Nameplate capacity | 2256 MW |
| Capacity factor | 90.93% (2017) 87.25% (lifetime) |
| Annual net output | 17,718 GWh (2023) [4] |
| External links | |
| Website | Diablo Canyon Power Plant |
| Commons | Related media on Commons |
The Diablo Canyon Power Plant is a nuclear power plant near Avila Beach in San Luis Obispo County, California. Following the permanent shutdown of the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station in 2013, Diablo Canyon is now the only operational nuclear plant in California, as well as the state's largest single power station. It was the subject of controversy and protests during its construction, with nearly two thousand civil disobedience arrests in a two-week period in 1981.
The plant has two Westinghouse-designed 4-loop pressurized-water nuclear reactors operated by Pacific Gas & Electric (PG&E). Together, the twin 1100 MWe reactors produce about 18,000 GW·h of electricity annually (8.6% of total California generation and 23% of carbon-free generation), supplying the electrical needs of more than 3 million people.[5] The plant produces electricity for about 6 cents per kWh, less than the average cost of 10.1 cents per kWh that PG&E paid for electricity from other suppliers in 2014.[6]
Though it was built less than a mile from the Shoreline Fault line, which was not known to exist at the time of construction, and is located less than three miles (4.8 km) from the Hosgri fault, a 2016 NRC probabilistic risk assessment of the plant, taking into account seismic risk, estimated the frequency of core damage at one instance per 7.6 million reactor years.[7] The plant is located in Nuclear Regulatory Commission Region IV.
In 2016, PG&E announced that it plans to close the two Diablo Canyon reactors in 2024 and 2025, stating that because California's energy regulations give renewables priority over nuclear, the plant would likely only run half-time, making it uneconomical.[3] (Nuclear plants are used for base load in order to spread their large fixed costs over as many kWh of generation as possible.)[3] In 2020, experts at the California Independent System Operator (CAISO) warned that when the plant closes the state will reach a "critical inflection point", which will create a significant challenge to ensure reliability of the grid without resorting to more fossil fuel usage, and could jeopardize California's greenhouse gas reduction targets.[8][9][10] In 2021 the California Energy Commission and CAISO warned that the state may have summer blackouts in future years as a result of Diablo's closure coinciding with the shutdown of four natural gas plants of 3.7GW total capacity, and the inability to rely on imported electricity during West-wide heat waves due to reduced hydroelectric capacity (from the decades-long drought) and the closure of coal plants.[11] A 2021 report from researchers at MIT and Stanford states that keeping Diablo Canyon running until 2035 would reduce the state's carbon emissions from electricity generation by 11% every year, save the state a cumulative $2.6 billion (rising to $21 billion if kept open until 2045), and improve the reliability of the grid.[12][13][14][15] Full decommissioning of the plant is estimated to take decades and cost nearly $4 billion.[16]
- ^ "EIA – California Nuclear Profile 2010". www.eia.gov. Energy Information Administration, U.S. Department of Energy (DOE). April 26, 2012. Archived from the original on May 19, 2017.
- ^ Johnston, Louis; Williamson, Samuel H. (2023). "What Was the U.S. GDP Then?". MeasuringWorth. Retrieved November 30, 2023. United States Gross Domestic Product deflator figures follow the MeasuringWorth series.
- ^ a b c Cite error: The named reference
SFC_2016-06-21was invoked but never defined (see the help page). - ^ "Electricity Data Browser – Diablo Canyon". www.eia.gov. Retrieved March 21, 2024.
- ^ Economic Benefits of Diablo Canyon Power Plant Archived May 28, 2023, at the Wayback Machine, PG&E, June 2013
- ^ Cite error: The named reference
SFC_2015-11-14was invoked but never defined (see the help page). - ^ Pruitt, Tony (October 3, 2016). "Diablo Canyon Power Plant – NRC Inspection Report" (PDF). nrc.gov. Retrieved November 16, 2018.
- ^ Cite error: The named reference
CAISO_reportwas invoked but never defined (see the help page). - ^ Cite error: The named reference
UD_1was invoked but never defined (see the help page). - ^ Cite error: The named reference
LAT_2021-05-18was invoked but never defined (see the help page). - ^ Cite error: The named reference
WSJ_2021-10-16was invoked but never defined (see the help page). - ^ Cite error: The named reference
Economist_2021-11-10was invoked but never defined (see the help page). - ^ Cite error: The named reference
LAT_2021-11-14was invoked but never defined (see the help page). - ^ Cite error: The named reference
BB_2021-11-09was invoked but never defined (see the help page). - ^ Cite error: The named reference
EENews_2021-11-10was invoked but never defined (see the help page). - ^ Cite error: The named reference
SFC_2018-04-13was invoked but never defined (see the help page).