U.S. non-profit public policy think tank
This article needs to be updated . Please help update this article to reflect recent events or newly available information. (November 2020 )
The Discovery Institute (DI ) is a politically conservative [ 2] [ 3] [ 4] think tank that advocates the pseudoscientific concept[ 5] [ 6] [ 7] of intelligent design (ID). It was founded in 1991[ 8] in Seattle as a non-profit offshoot of the Hudson Institute .
Its "Teach the Controversy " campaign aims to permit the teaching of anti-evolution , intelligent-design beliefs in United States public high school science courses in place of accepted scientific theories , positing that a scientific controversy exists over whether evolution is a reality, when in fact there is none.[ 9] [ 10] [ 11] [ 12]
Cite error: There are <ref group=lower-alpha>
tags or {{efn}}
templates on this page, but the references will not show without a {{reflist|group=lower-alpha}}
template or {{notelist}}
template (see the help page ).
^ a b "Charity Navigator Rating - Discovery Institute" . Charity Navigator . Glen Rock, NJ: Charity Navigator. Archived from the original on April 13, 2016. Retrieved September 11, 2015 .
^ Cite error: The named reference wilgoren
was invoked but never defined (see the help page ).
^ "Intelligent Design: Creationism's Trojan Horse - A Conversation With Barbara Forrest" . Church & State (Unabridged interview). Washington, D.C.: Americans United for Separation of Church and State . February 2005. ISSN 2163-3746 . Archived from the original on May 17, 2014. Retrieved May 27, 2014 .
^ Jones, Thomas (November 1, 2001). "Short Cuts" . London Review of Books . 23 (21): 22. ISSN 0260-9592 . Archived from the original on December 26, 2009. Retrieved June 24, 2010 .
^ Boudry, Maarten ; Blancke, Stefaan; Braeckman, Johan (December 2010). "Irreducible Incoherence and Intelligent Design: A Look into the Conceptual Toolbox of a Pseudoscience" (PDF) . The Quarterly Review of Biology . 85 (4). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press : 473–482. doi :10.1086/656904 . hdl :1854/LU-952482 . PMID 21243965 . S2CID 27218269 . Archived (PDF) from the original on October 9, 2022. Article available from Universiteit Gent Archived June 26, 2015, at the Wayback Machine
^ Pigliucci, Massimo (2010). "Science in the Courtroom: The Case against Intelligent Design" (PDF) . Nonsense on Stilts: How to Tell Science from Bunk . Chicago: University of Chicago Press. pp. 160–186. ISBN 978-0-226-66786-7 . LCCN 2009049778 . OCLC 457149439 . Archived (PDF) from the original on October 9, 2022.
^ Perakh, Mark; Young, Matt (2004). "13. Is Intelligent Design Science?". In Young, Matt; Edis, Taner (eds.). Why Intelligent Design Fails: A Scientific Critique of the New Creationism . Rutgers University Press. pp. 195–196. ISBN 0-8135-3433-X . Archived from the original on March 27, 2023. Retrieved December 3, 2023 .
^ "What we do" . Discovery Institute . Archived from the original on October 31, 2023. Retrieved July 17, 2023 .
^ Forrest, Barbara (May 2007). "Understanding the Intelligent Design Creationist Movement: Its True Nature and Goals" (PDF) . Center for Inquiry . Washington, D.C.: Center for Inquiry. Archived from the original (PDF) on May 19, 2011. Retrieved August 6, 2007 .
^ "Small Group Wields Major Influence in Intelligent Design Debate" . World News Tonight . New York: American Broadcasting Company . November 9, 2005. Archived from the original on May 21, 2011. Retrieved June 24, 2010 .
^ Mooney, Chris (December 2002). "Survival of the Slickest" . The American Prospect . 13 (22). Washington, D.C. Archived from the original on February 21, 2012. Retrieved July 23, 2008 .
^ Dembski, William A. (2001). "Teaching Intelligent Design: What Happened When?" . Access Research Network . Colorado Springs, CO. Archived from the original on April 7, 2023. Retrieved May 5, 2014 .