 | Review waiting, please be patient.
This may take 6 weeks or more, since drafts are reviewed in no specific order. There are 1,139 pending submissions waiting for review.
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
Reviewer tools
|
| Submission declined on 23 August 2024 by SafariScribe (talk). This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources. This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
This draft has been resubmitted and is currently awaiting re-review. |  |
| Submission declined on 21 August 2024 by SafariScribe (talk). This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources. Declined by SafariScribe 2 months ago. | |
| Submission declined on 21 August 2024 by Bobby Cohn (talk). The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. Please cite your sources using footnotes. For instructions on how to do this, please see Referencing for beginners. Thank you. This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies. Declined by Bobby Cohn 2 months ago. | |
Comment: Please calm down so as to avoid mistakes. We need sources that are not trivial mentions of Adam J. Minnick. For example, assuming a source says, "Buzzard is a 2014 film and has many wonderful editors. Adam J. Minnick was the cinematographer and the film was shot in America. The film is noted for its simplicity and gave goals to all the supports it received during the screening." This statement above doesn't show any notability about the director. If it had narrated a bit good directing and praise, then, we can consider. Most of your sources are purely mention and neither way can I tell you that he meets WP: CREATIVE nor WP:ANYBIO. Look for sources that headlines him as a notable cinematographer and how he has used his work to achieve notability. Read WP:INHERITED to avoid using unnecessary sources. Safari ScribeEdits! Talk! 19:04, 23 August 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: IMDb, Letterboxd, Tribeca, e.t.c. are not reliable sources. See WP:RS for a guide. Safari ScribeEdits! Talk! 22:08, 21 August 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: Per WP:BLP, personal information must be cited, currently the "Early life and education" section is entirely unreferenced. Bobby Cohn (talk) 00:07, 21 August 2024 (UTC)
Adam J. Minnick | |
|---|---|
 | |
| Born | October 20, 1978 Alpena, Michigan, USA |
| Alma mater | Colorado State University (BFA) |
| Occupation | Cinematographer |
| Years active | 2012–present |
| Website | adamjminnick.com |
Adam J. Minnick (born October 20, 1978) is an American cinematographer best known for his collaborations with directors Joel Potrykus,[1] Aaron Schimberg,[2] Nathan Silver,[3] and Geoff Marslett.[4] His work includes films such as Buzzard (2014), Actor Martinez (2016), Chained For Life (2018), Relaxer (2018), Quantum Cowboys (2022) and Vulcanizadora (2024).[5] He has worked extensively in both film and digital formats, and received a B.F.A. in Photography at Colorado State University in 2003. He resides in Austin, Texas.
- ^ Hutchinson, Chase (2024-06-09). "'Vulcanizadora' Review: Joel Potrykus' Horror Film Will Melt Your Face Off | Tribeca 2024". Collider. Retrieved 2024-08-21.
- ^ Tafelski, Tanner (2018-06-20). "See and Be Seen: Aaron Schimberg's 'Chained for Life'". Vague Visages. Retrieved 2024-08-21.
- ^ 22 West Media (2016-11-29). Actor Martinez Interview with Nathan Silver & Adam J. Minnick. Retrieved 2024-08-21 – via YouTube.
{{cite AV media}}: CS1 maint: numeric names: authors list (link) - ^ "Quantum Cowboys". Factory 25. Retrieved 2024-08-21.
- ^ "Adam J. Minnick". MUBI. Retrieved 2024-08-21.