 | Review waiting, please be patient.
This may take 6 weeks or more, since drafts are reviewed in no specific order. There are 1,185 pending submissions waiting for review.
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
Reviewer tools
|
| Submission declined on 16 November 2024 by TheBirdsShedTears (talk). This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
This draft has been resubmitted and is currently awaiting re-review. |  |
| Submission declined on 12 October 2024 by SafariScribe (talk). This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. Declined by SafariScribe 39 days ago. | |
Comment: The best way to expedite the review of an uncontroversial submission is to provide minimum 3 high-quality sources with in-depth coverage, rather than including an excessive number of references. For instance, Anand Reddi is a health system strengthening expert, global health specialist and public health advocate...
needs only 1-2 refs rather than [1][2][3][4][5][6][7]. Please see WP:CITEKILL for future reference. TheBirdsShedTears (talk) 15:24, 15 November 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: Thanks for the excellent feedback. Will apply. This article has been completely rewritten per editorial feedback and past comments from the previous deletion. Thank you @Asilvering 💬 17:47, 28 October 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: You can put links in the references only if they support the content in the sentence the reference is attached to. So the external links I was talking about before wouldn't be good as references. If you think they're relevant enough to belong in a separate External links section, you can put them there. asilvering (talk) 20:10, 27 October 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: just a quick note: no external links in body of articles, see WP:EL for more info asilvering (talk) 22:36, 25 October 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: This article has been completely rewritten per editorial feedback and past comments from the previous deletion. Thank you @SafariScribe and @CFA for the excellent feedback and very thoughtful responses to improve the article. 1. The references have been improved including notable 3rd party new sources since the initial submission per @SafariScribe. 2. The draft has been significantly re-written to reflect the past editorial comments @CFA💬 17:47, 11 October 2024 (UTC)
Anand Reddi | |
|---|---|
| Born | Maryland, USA |
| Nationality | American |
| Education | University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, University of Colorado School of Medicine |
| Occupation(s) | Global Health Policy Specialist, Public Health Advocate, Biotech Executive |
| Known for | Advocacy in global HIV/AIDS treatment and health systems strengthening |
| Awards | Fulbright Scholar, American Medical Association Foundation Leadership Award |
Anand Reddi is a health system strengthening expert focusing on global health and public health advocacy. His work focused on global HIV scale-up including the President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR).[1][2][3] Additionally, he is active in advancing public-private global health partnerships with biotech to support access to essential medicines.[4][5]
- ^ Nuki, Paul; Townsley, Simon (18 July 2018). "HIV and Aids in Africa has a new adversary – God and big pharma". The Telegraph.
- ^ Ratcliffe, Rebecca (22 July 2018). "Biker nun on a mission to free Tanzania from grip of HIV". The Guardian.
- ^ Liu, Richard (19 November 2020). "Atlantic Dialogues Talks 2020: Health Capacities as a New Power Instrument". The Atlantic Dialogues: Policy Center for the New South.
- ^ "Pharma companies are capitalizing on Covid-19 restrictions to promote unbranded campaigns". Pharmaceutical Technology Review. Retrieved 23 July 2024.
- ^ Bulik, Beth Snyder (28 Oct 2020). "BI, Gilead execs highlight value of disease awareness campaigns—particularly during the pandemic". Fierce Pharma.