Draft:David Duggleby

Review waiting, please be patient. This may take 6 weeks or more, since drafts are reviewed in no specific order. There are 1,187 pending submissions waiting for review. If the submission is accepted, then this page will be moved into the article space. If the submission is declined, then the reason will be posted here. In the meantime, you can continue to improve this submission by editing normally. Where to get help If you need help editing or submitting your draft, please ask us a question at the AfC Help Desk or get live help from experienced editors. These venues are only for help with editing and the submission process, not to get reviews. If you need feedback on your draft, or if the review is taking a lot of time, you can try asking for help on the talk page of a relevant WikiProject. Some WikiProjects are more active than others so a speedy reply is not guaranteed. How to improve a draft Wikipedia:Contributing to Wikipedia – a basic overview on how to edit Wikipedia. Help:Wikitext – how to use the markup Help:Referencing for beginners – how to include references Wikipedia:Article development – how to develop your article Wikipedia:Writing better articles – how to improve your article Wikipedia:Verifiability – make sure your article includes reliable third-party sources You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Add tags to your draft Editor resources Easy tools: Citation bot (help) | Advanced: Fix bare URLs Reviewer tools Instructions · What links here · David Duggleby (talk: + · bio) · (log) · Copyvios report · reFill · Citation Bot · (Search: Google, Wikipedia) · Submitted 21 days ago by Benkariuki (talk: D · +) · Last edited 0 seconds ago

Submission declined on 11 October 2024 by AlphaBetaGamma (talk). This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject. If you would like to continue working on the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window. If you have not resolved the issues listed above, your draft will be declined again and potentially deleted. If you need extra help, please ask us a question at the AfC Help Desk or get live help from experienced editors. Please do not remove reviewer comments or this notice until the submission is accepted. Where to get help If you need help editing or submitting your draft, please ask us a question at the AfC Help Desk or get live help from experienced editors. These venues are only for help with editing and the submission process, not to get reviews. If you need feedback on your draft, or if the review is taking a lot of time, you can try asking for help on the talk page of a relevant WikiProject. Some WikiProjects are more active than others so a speedy reply is not guaranteed. How to improve a draft Wikipedia:Contributing to Wikipedia – a basic overview on how to edit Wikipedia. Help:Wikitext – how to use the markup Help:Referencing for beginners – how to include references Wikipedia:Article development – how to develop your article Wikipedia:Writing better articles – how to improve your article Wikipedia:Verifiability – make sure your article includes reliable third-party sources You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Add tags to your draft Editor resources Easy tools: Citation bot (help) | Advanced: Fix bare URLs Declined by AlphaBetaGamma 40 days ago. Last edited 0 seconds ago. Reviewer: Inform author. This draft has been resubmitted and is currently awaiting re-review.

Submission declined on 2 August 2024 by SafariScribe (talk). This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are: in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements) reliable secondary strictly independent of the subject Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. Declined by SafariScribe 3 months ago.

• Comment: There are still some issues with promo wording. For instance, what makes the list of auctions "notable" as state in the heading? Some of the sources that appear they meet WP:ORGCRIT such as this may not meet the criteria (this one is not bylined so questions may arise as to editorial oversight). I am on the fence for moving to mainspace but I do not think it would pass an AfD. CNMall41 (talk) 23:07, 29 October 2024 (UTC)

• Comment: Pretty close to being accepted, but the end of lead section had claims not in the body part, and also unsourced. "Maintains a significant presence in the UK" sounds promotional especially when unsourced. ABG (Talk/Report any mistakes here) 02:08, 11 October 2024 (UTC)

• Comment: just advertising. Theroadislong (talk) 13:39, 9 August 2024 (UTC)

David Duggleby

Company type	Private
Industry	Auctions, Valuations, Antiques, Art, Jewellery
Founded	c. 1996
Headquarters	Scarborough, England
Area served	Worldwide
Products	Fine arts, Jewellery, Antique Furniture, Mouseman & Yorkshire Oak, Rare coins, Stamps, Toys & Model Railways, Militaria
Website	davidduggleby.com

David Duggleby Auctioneers & Valuers is a British auction house incorporated in 2002^[1] with headquarters in Scarborough, North Yorkshire in the United Kingdom. The business was founded by Jane and David Duggleby and currently run by William Duggleby. The company is one of Yorkshire's largest brokers of antiques, fine and decorative art, jewellery, and collectibles and has 5 locations: Scarborough, Beverley, Harrogate^[2] & Whitby,^[3] York^{[4] [5]}. They are part of the Duggleby Group, which has roots in the removals and storage industry.