Review waiting, please be patient.
This may take 6 weeks or more, since drafts are reviewed in no specific order. There are 1,216 pending submissions waiting for review.
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
Reviewer tools
|
Submission declined on 10 October 2024 by Netherzone (talk). This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
This draft has been resubmitted and is currently awaiting re-review. |
A major contributor to this article appears to have a close connection with its subject. (October 2024) |
Giovanni Pizzo (1938, Veroli – 2022, Rome) was an Italian artist and one of the representatives of the arte programmata movement. His work intersected with scientific methodologies, emphasizing logical-mathematical processes and visual perception.[1]
Giovanni Pizzo | |
---|---|
Born | 1938 Veroli |
Died | 2022 Rome |
Movement | Arte programmata |
Spouse | Lucia di Luciano |
For Pizzo, art was a form of research conducted through systematic, programmed processes, which he initially developed in notebooks before transferring them to canvas.[2] Today, his approach to merging art, science, and technology is referenced in discussions about the history of computers and digital art.[3][4]
Together with Lucia di Luciano, Pizzo participated in the Nove Tendencije 3 exhibition in 1965, in Zagreb, Croatia. He participated in VIII Quadriennale d’Arte di Roma (1960), Esposizione Universale di Montreal (1968), VI Biennale Romana (1968), Biennale Internazionale di Barcellona (1992), etc.[5]
:2
was invoked but never defined (see the help page).:1
was invoked but never defined (see the help page).