 | Review waiting, please be patient.
This may take 5 weeks or more, since drafts are reviewed in no specific order. There are 1,003 pending submissions waiting for review.
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
Reviewer tools
|
| Submission declined on 6 June 2024 by Jlwoodwa (talk). This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
This draft has been resubmitted and is currently awaiting re-review. |  |
| Submission declined on 2 June 2024 by Grabup (talk). This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. Declined by Grabup 4 months ago. | |
Comment: Is this a fictional or legendary character? If so, please read Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Writing about fiction. jlwoodwa (talk) 19:56, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: Reviewers, please check User talk:Grabup?markasread=316350322&markasreadwiki=enwiki and go to the section "Draft:Hinagahime" before reviewing! - User:Camillz
- Comment: Reviewers, please check User talk:Grabup?markasread=316350322&markasreadwiki=enwiki and go to the section "Draft:Hinagahime" before reviewing! - User:Camillz
| Hinagahime
肥長比売 | |
|---|---|
| Princess | |
| Spouse | Homutsuwake no Mikoto |
| House | Imperial House of Japan |
Hinagahime (肥長比売), was the spouse of Homutsuwake no Mikoto for just one day.
- in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
- reliable
- secondary
- independent of the subject
Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.