Review waiting, please be patient.
This may take 2 months or more, since drafts are reviewed in no specific order. There are 1,290 pending submissions waiting for review.
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
Reviewer tools
|
Submission declined on 19 March 2024 by GraziePrego (talk). This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources. This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
This draft has been resubmitted and is currently awaiting re-review. |
This article has multiple issues. Please help improve it or discuss these issues on the talk page. (Learn how and when to remove these messages)
|
Igor Janev | |
---|---|
Born |
Igor Janev (Macedonian: Игор Jанев) is a Yugoslav and Macedonian diplomat and political scientist.[1]
Janev was born in Belgrade on September 29, 1964,[2] which was, at that time, part of Yugoslavia.
In 1994, he obtained combine degree of a Doctor of Juridical Science and a PhD in political science from the Faculty of Law at Methodius University in Skopje, after which he spent time as a postdoctoral visiting researcher at Georgetown University, the University of Virginia, and Tufts University.[2] In 1995 and 1996, he was a Research Associate at the Fletcher School of Law and Diplomacy.[3]
Janev has published 116 scientific articles and more than 25 monographs in the scientific areas of international law and international relations.[2][4] He was a special counsel of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Republic of Macedonia from 2001 to 2002. In 2002, he was a special advisor to the president of the Republic of Macedonia.[5] Janev have published thousands of papers, comments and interviews in local Macedonian media.[6]
Janev was an international expert who proposed to the United Nations Senior Management Group (SMG[7]) a new model for co-ordination in the UN system of organizations, with the potential for elimination of the negative administrative and financial effects of the present mechanism of co-ordination in the UN system. His model is based on the idea of introducing a budgetary control mechanism into the United Nations inter-agency system by providing the UN General Assembly with a legal power to approve (not only consider) the regular (administrative) budgets of UN-related agencies, by amending article 17 (paragraph 3) of the United Nations Charter. This amendment would induce a stronger de facto and de jure binding power in all United Nations decisions relating to the program(s) and budget co-ordination within the UN system and thus create a more centralized and efficient system. Administrative agreements and arrangements governing relations between the United Nations and the UN-related organizations (Specialized Agencies and IAEA) in the UN system would also be amended in accordance with that revision.[8][9]