 | Review waiting, please be patient.
This may take 2 months or more, since drafts are reviewed in no specific order. There are 1,279 pending submissions waiting for review.
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
Reviewer tools
|
| Submission declined on 24 September 2024 by SafariScribe (talk). This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources. This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
This draft has been resubmitted and is currently awaiting re-review. |  |
| Submission declined on 24 September 2024 by Timtrent (talk). This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. Declined by Timtrent 8 days ago. | |
Comment: Now you have gone overboard, and are very close to bombarding the draft with referencesPlease discard references which are mere passing mentions.Please discard interviews with here. What she says is not required. What others say about here is.Lose IMDB. It is a user content site with minimal editorial oversight"Oleanna.[11] [12] [13] [14" is a prime example of WP:CITEKILL. Instead we need one excellent reference per fact asserted. If you are sure it is beneficial, two, and at an absolute maximum, three. Three is not a target, it's a limit. Aim for one. A fact you assert, once verified in a reliable source, is verified. More is gilding the lily. Please choose the very best in each case of multiple referencing for a single point and either drop or repurpose the remainder.It's very difficult to review a draft without knowing which references you will choose 🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦 16:26, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: Playbills or blurb about a play do not a reference make. Signif9cant coverage in multiple reliable sources independent of the subject are references 🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦 15:29, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Joanne Margaret Hartstone (BCA[Drama] (Hons), GradDipEd[Secondary]) is a multi-award-winning theatre maker, performer, playwright, director, producer, and presenter specializing in international theatrical collaborations, live theatre & cabaret, and immersive/site-specific events.[1] Joanne has curated and built pop-up venues in the Adelaide Botanic Garden (Black Box Theatres) and The Queen's Theatre in Adelaide and has presented multiple seasons as a performer and producer in Edinburgh Festival Fringe, Hollywood Fringe Festival, London, New York, and Sydney. Since 2007, Joanne has been a prolific practitioner in the Australian live entertainment industry, regularly presenting work at the Adelaide Fringe.[2] She has published two plays, The Girl Who Jumped Off The Hollywood Sign and That Daring Australian Girl. Joanne has won the inaugural Made In Adelaide Award in 2017,[3] the Frank Ford Award in 2020, multiple Best Theatre and Adelaide Critics Circle Awards, and two innovation awards in 2021 for her digital theatre work, Black Box Live™, during the COVID-19 pandemic.[4] She is also a registered secondary school teacher and has been a mentor to emerging artists, including serving as a mentor for the Adelaide Cabaret Festival's 'Class of Cabaret' for three years (2021–2023).[5]
- ^ Meegan, Genevieve (February 23, 2024). "'If I do my job well then I should really be invisible'". InReview.
- ^ Harris, Samela. "The Girl Who Jumped Off the Hollywood Sign". www.thebarefootreview.com.au.
- ^ "Joanne Hartstone's Muriel Matters play a symbolic triumph for Adelaide Fringe theatre". Adelaide AZ.
- ^ "Awards Archive | Adelaide Fringe - 21 February - 23 March 2025". adelaidefringe.com.au.
- ^ Adelaide, Glam (June 26, 2023). "Cabaret Festival Review: Class of Cabaret".