This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:
in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
If you would like to continue working on the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you have not resolved the issues listed above, your draft will be declined again and potentially deleted.
If you need extra help, please ask us a question at the AfC Help Desk or get live help from experienced editors.
Please do not remove reviewer comments or this notice until the submission is accepted.
Where to get help
If you need help editing or submitting your draft, please ask us a question at the AfC Help Desk or get live help from experienced editors. These venues are only for help with editing and the submission process, not to get reviews.
If you need feedback on your draft, or if the review is taking a lot of time, you can try asking for help on the talk page of a relevant WikiProject. Some WikiProjects are more active than others so a speedy reply is not guaranteed.
To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags.
Once you save your changes using the "Publish changes" button below, you will be able to resubmit your draft for review by pressing the "Resubmit" button that will appear here.
Submission declined on 3 July 2024 by CNMall41 (talk).
This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:
in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Comment: There are still ubsircd informations in this article. Best, R.B. 07:08, 18 October 2024 (UTC)
Comment: I'm personally having a hard time understanding why this topic needs a standalone article. The distillery building (in which the products covered in this article are manufactured) already has an article. At Kilbeggan Distillery. And the distillery parent company (which owns/markets the products covered in this article) also already has an article. At Suntory Global Spirits. How is the brand-specific subsidiary company independently notable (of the distillery from which it operates and the corporate group in which it operates)? Per WP:NPRODUCT, significant independent coverage is required to establish distinct notability (between a company and its products). And, other than the "history/background" text here, which is near VERBATIM duplicated or copied(?) from Kilbeggan Distillery, the main topic seems to be a series of products. That, to my read, don't appear to have independent notability. What am I missing here?If this article is going to be, effectively, a WP:CFORK of content already covered at Kilbeggan Distillery, and a list of products that could/should be covered at Suntory Global Spirits, how would this (additional) title fit within project scope and guidelines? Guliolopez (talk) 15:45, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
Comment: There is a lot of information on the page that is not sourced. This needs sourced or removed. Also need sources meeting WP:ORGCRIT to show notability. CNMall41 (talk) 20:57, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
Irish Whiskey Company
Comment: I'm personally having a hard time understanding why this topic needs a standalone article. The distillery building (in which the products covered in this article are manufactured) already has an article. At Kilbeggan Distillery. And the distillery parent company (which owns/markets the products covered in this article) also already has an article. At Suntory Global Spirits. How is the brand-specific subsidiary company independently notable (of the distillery from which it operates and the corporate group in which it operates)? Per WP:NPRODUCT, significant independent coverage is required to establish distinct notability (between a company and its products). And, other than the "history/background" text here, which is near VERBATIM duplicated or copied(?) from Kilbeggan Distillery, the main topic seems to be a series of products. That, to my read, don't appear to have independent notability. What am I missing here?If this article is going to be, effectively, a WP:CFORK of content already covered at Kilbeggan Distillery, and a list of products that could/should be covered at Suntory Global Spirits, how would this (additional) title fit within project scope and guidelines?
The Kilbeggan Distilling Company (stylized as, Kilbeggan Distilling Co.) are Irish Whiskey producers owned by Suntory Global Spirits since 2012. As a successor to 'John Locke & Co. Ltd.' and current owners of the historic Kilbeggan Distillery and its original 1757 license, the Kilbeggan Distilling Co. are Ireland's oldest licensed whiskey distillers.[1]
Established in 1988 by John Teeling, the Kilbeggan Distilling Co. produces Whiskey in Cooley Distillery in Dundalk, Co. Louth and also in the historic Kilbeggan Distillery in Kilbeggan, Co. Westmeath Kilbeggan is the oldest licensed distillery in Ireland and Kilbeggan Whiskey is their flagship whiskey.
- in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
- reliable
- secondary
- independent of the subject
Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.