| Submission rejected on 20 October 2024 by Snowman304 (talk). This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. Rejected by Snowman304 4 days ago. Last edited 0 seconds ago. |  |
| Submission declined on 6 September 2024 by Pygos (talk). This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject. Declined by Pygos 49 days ago. |  |
| Submission declined on 25 August 2024 by Ktkvtsh (talk). This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. Declined by Ktkvtsh 60 days ago. | |
| Submission declined on 25 August 2024 by Greenman (talk). This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject. Declined by Greenman 2 months ago. | |
| Submission declined on 11 August 2024 by Significa liberdade (talk). This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. Declined by Significa liberdade 2 months ago. | |
| Submission declined on 11 August 2024 by Johannes Maximilian (talk). This draft has too many issues; it reads very much like a CV. The external links are still present in the body, the infobox is broken, and the licence for the infobox photograph is missing. Why does the draft put so much emphasis on the subject's birthplace's name? We got a Romanian, German, and Magyar spelling, why not also an English, Russian, and Serbocroatian one? Timișoara is misspelt. Multiple strong points of view are not attributed to any sources. The lead section is too long, and most sections in this draft aren't prose. How did you phrase it? This is a draft "with strong improvement perspectives". Best, --Johannes (Talk) (Contribs) (Articles) 00:30, 11 August 2024 (UTC) Declined by Johannes Maximilian 2 months ago. | |
| Submission declined on 10 August 2024 by KylieTastic (talk). This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources. Declined by KylieTastic 2 months ago. | |
| Submission declined on 10 August 2024 by CFA (talk). The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. Please cite your sources using footnotes. For instructions on how to do this, please see Referencing for beginners. Thank you. Declined by CFA 2 months ago. | |
Comment: Still a résumé (see WP:NOTRESUME) and has been submitted and rejected 7 times now. Multiple editors have commented on the quality, and nothing notable has changed. Snowman304|talk 21:05, 20 October 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: Very little has changed in this since the last deletion, only the "top 2%" claim which is not that notable since his publication record on Google Scholar is not impressive. No attempt to rectify issues. I think it may be time for a delete without option to resubmit. Ldm1954 (talk) 14:22, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: Still reads like a resume? Theroadislong (talk) 11:12, 6 September 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: I see that you have improved on your citations, and great job on that. However, it still looks very much like a resume, as previous reviewers mentioned. It deserves a structural rearrangement before you submit it again. Pygos (talk) 06:15, 6 September 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: This reads like a resume, see WP:NOTRESUME. Ktkvtsh (talk) 23:52, 25 August 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: At present, there is not enough evidence that Mutascu meets Wikipedia's notability guidelines for academics. Further, as Johannes previously stated, the article currently reads like a resume. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 21:50, 11 August 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: This is just a CV and is not neutral in tone. Theroadislong (talk) 09:28, 11 August 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: Please remove the external links from the article body. C F A 💬 16:48, 10 August 2024 (UTC)
 | This biographical article is written like a résumé. (October 2024) |
Mihai Mutascu | |
|---|---|
 | |
| Born | December 21, 1974 Moldova Noua, Banat, Romania |
| Occupations |
|
| Years active | 1998-present |
| Website | www |
Mihai Mutascu is a Romanian economist, currently serving as a Professor of Public Economics at the West University of Timișoara. His research focuses on Public Economics and Taxation, with particular emphasis on the application of wavelet analysis in economic studies. In 2024, he was listed among the world’s top 2% of scientists based on citations received in 2023, according to the Stanford/Elsevier database in its August 2024 update.[1]
- ^ Ioannidis, John P. A.; Baas, Jeroen; Klavans, Richard; Boyack, Kevin W. (2019-08-12). "A standardized citation metrics author database annotated for scientific field". PLOS Biology. 17 (8): e3000384. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.3000384. ISSN 1545-7885. PMC 6699798. PMID 31404057.