Submission declined on 23 August 2024 by SafariScribe (talk).
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
Once you save your changes using the "Publish changes" button below, you will be able to resubmit your draft for review by pressing the "Resubmit" button that will appear here. |
Neil J. Dorans is a retired American psychometrician. He was the main architect for the recentered SAT scales introduced in the mid-1990s.[1] [2] He has also performed linking studies relating the SAT scores to the ACT scores.[3] He also focused on fairness assessment at the item and score levels and introduced the standardization approach to assess item-level fairness in 1983.[4]
Dorans received the Career Contributions Award from the National Council on Measurement in Education in 2010[5] in recognition of his theoretical and technical developments and his ideas that have significantly affected measurement practices. He received the 2017 Association of Test Publishers Career Achievement Award.[6] In 2021, he received the Robert L. Linn Distinguished Address Award.[7] He received the ETS Measurement Statistician Award in 2003.
Dorans has edited several books in educational measurement including "Computerized Adaptive Testing: A Primer",[8] "Fairness in Educational Assessment and Measurement",[9] and "Linking and Aligning Scores and Scales".[10] He has published numerous journal articles, technical reports, and book chapters on differential item functioning, score equating and score linking, context effects, and item response theory.
- meet any of the eight academic-specific criteria
- or cite multiple reliable, secondary sources independent of the subject, which cover the subject in some depth
Make sure your draft meets one of the criteria above before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If the subject does not meet any of the criteria, it is not suitable for Wikipedia.