| Submission declined on 23 October 2024 by SafariScribe (talk). This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
Once you save your changes using the "Publish changes" button below, you will be able to resubmit your draft for review by pressing the "Resubmit" button that will appear here. |  |
| Submission declined on 25 June 2024 by SafariScribe (talk). This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. Declined by SafariScribe 3 months ago. | |
| Submission declined on 15 March 2024 by Johannes Maximilian (talk). This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources. Declined by Johannes Maximilian 7 months ago. | |
| Submission declined on 4 March 2024 by Paul W (talk). This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. Please cite your sources using footnotes. For instructions on how to do this, please see Referencing for beginners. Thank you. Declined by Paul W 7 months ago. | |
Comment: Yes, it could be frustrating to see one reveiwer declining your draft twice or thrice, as the case may be, and likewise, it is improper to keep resubmitting a draft that has been explicitly declined and with reasons why it doesn't meet that criteria. The best option one could do may be to see some piece of advice, e.t.c. This draft doesn't meet WP:NPRODUCER. If you insist, I would take it to mainspace, and help you with the reviewing at AFD, where you may see others opinion on it. Cheers! Safari ScribeEdits! Talk! 02:12, 23 October 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: Unclear if this person is genuinely notable. Some sections of the article are peppered with footnotes, others (often successive paragraphs) are entirely devoid of footnotes - all significant assertions need to be supported by citations from reliable sources (interviews with the subject or self-penned profiles are not reliable). Notability demands significant (ie: in-depth, extensive) coverage - not just routine or passing mentions - about the subject, not by the subject. Paul W (talk) 15:37, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
Randy Tat | |
|---|---|
| Born | |
| Nationality | American |
| Education | Cornish College of the Arts University of Washington |
| Occupation | Producer |
| Years active | 1987-present |
| Notable work | Finding Andrea Fourth Down and Love Families Who Kill: The Donut Shop Murders How to Lose a Guy in 10 Days |
| Spouse(s) | Sheryl Benezra (m. 1992- present) |
| Children | 2 |
| Relatives | Harley Tat (brother) |
Randy Tat is an American television and film producer. He is most known for producing the television series Finding Andrea and the film Fourth Down and Love.[1] He lives in Los Angeles, California.[2]
- ^ "Pascale Hutton & Ryan Paevey Are College Sweethearts In Fourth Down And Love". Celebrating The Soaps. 2023-08-05. Retrieved 2024-02-06.
- ^ "Dad Goes Shopping". Press Telegram. 2007-11-28. Retrieved 2024-02-07.