| Submission declined on 23 October 2024 by CoconutOctopus (talk). This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
Once you save your changes using the "Publish changes" button below, you will be able to resubmit your draft for review by pressing the "Resubmit" button that will appear here. |  |
| Submission declined on 21 October 2024 by CFA (talk). This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies. Declined by CFA 40 hours ago. | |
| Submission declined on 7 October 2024 by KylieTastic (talk). This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources. Declined by KylieTastic 15 days ago. | |
| Submission declined on 1 October 2024 by KylieTastic (talk). This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. Declined by KylieTastic 21 days ago. | |
Shub Debgupta | |
|---|---|
| Born | Mumbai, India |
| Nationality | Indian-American |
| Education | Cornell University (PhD, MSc) |
| Alma mater | Clark University (BA) |
| Occupation(s) | Entrepreneur, Economist |
| Known for | Founding Predict Health, Inc. and WiserTogether, Inc. |
| Spouse | Garance Genicot |
| Relatives | Shohini Ghosh (Sister) |
Shub Debgupta is an Indian-American entrepreneur and economist. He is the founder and CEO of Predict Health, Inc..[1], an AI member intelligence platform that serves Medicare, Medicaid, and commercial healthcare payors. With a background in healthcare [2], Debgupta has developed technologies with a focus on improving healthcare outcomes.[3]
Debgupta previously founded WiserTogether, Inc.,[4] a patient navigation solution that was acquired by Evive Health. Debgupta's work has garnered recognition[5] across the healthcare and technology sectors, earning him accolades such as the NVTC Tech 100 award and the Innovator of the Year title from the Institute for Health Care Consumerism.
- ^ Predict Health https://www.predicthealth.ai/.
{{cite web}}: Missing or empty|title=(help) - ^ "Shub Debgupta - Founder + CEO at Predict Health, Inc". TheOrg.com.
- ^ "Q&A with WiserTogether CEO Shub Debgupta: Personal Health Care Decisions Based on Side Effects, Costs, Pain and Peer Experience". 7 Wire Ventures. 22 April 2014.
- ^ . MobiHealth https://www.mobihealthnews.com/36806/wisertogether-raises-9m-for-patient-facing-treatment-comparison-tool/.
{{cite news}}: Missing or empty|title=(help) - ^ Publishing Team, Tuck at Dartmouth. "Answer Patient Questions with Technology with Shub Debgupta, CEO of Wiser Together". Tuck at Dartmouth.