Review waiting, please be patient.
This may take 6 weeks or more, since drafts are reviewed in no specific order. There are 1,215 pending submissions waiting for review.
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
Reviewer tools
|
Social acceleration is a theory of time in late modernity developed by German sociologist Hartmut Rosa.
Social acceleration describes a frenetic sense of time caused by the increase in technological advancement since the Industrial Revolution. Rosa argues that advances in communication, transportation, and production have made things happen faster, creating new expectations of efficiency and speed in all areas of life in ways that alienate people from the world.[1][2][3]
In Rosa's view, a medieval peasant's life was organized around nature's linear time, such as seasons and day-night cycles.[1][4] Work and life tasks were dictated by nature, meaning there was little expectation for rapid change or constant activity.[1][4] In contrast, Rosa argues modern life is governed by abstract time. Abstract time structures are defined according to the task in question.[1][4] Abstract time is not bound by natural linear time, but by new temporal structures, such as schedules, deadlines, or even very short windows of time such as stock transactions, which can be executed in microseconds.[1] Abstract time treats time as a resource to be continually redefined, controlled and divided.[1] Therefore, instead of stability, late modern subjects experience frenetic change, intensification, and pressure to keep up.[1][5]
Rosa claims that social acceleration is present on both a international and individual level. For instance, he states that for a government's credit rating to remain to same they must accelerate the rate of production.[1] On the individual level, social acceleration has led to burnout, since the number of possible tasks and commitments far exceeds the amount of time available.[1][8] This creates a constant pressure to control, parameterise, and optimise every moment, leading individuals to feel perpetually overwhelmed and incapable of keeping pace, an experience he calls frenetic standstill.[1] Rosa suggests that this relentless acceleration not only leads to burnout but also disrupts our ability to form meaningful relationships with the world, causing alienation.[1][8][9]
This difference between linear time and abstract time is key to social acceleration.[1] On an individual level the result is a profound shift in everyday life, with modern people feeling a constant race against time, unlike the slower pace that medieval subjects experienced, in which hard work took up most of their lives, but for whom the number of possible tasks were clearly defined.[1] On a policy level, the rate of technological and social change is said to create an inertia effect where policymakers cannot keep up with challenging sociopolitical changes as they happen.[10] Therefore, regulation of technologies like AI are perpetually behind the actual rate of technological innovation in this area.
Rosa uses the term resonance to describe moments of brief respite from social acceleration.[11]