| Submission declined on 24 February 2024 by S0091 (talk). This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
Once you save your changes using the "Publish changes" button below, you will be able to resubmit your draft for review by pressing the "Resubmit" button that will appear here. |  |
| Submission declined on 1 September 2023 by Asilvering (talk). This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. Declined by Asilvering 14 months ago. | |
Comment: Per previous comments long with interviews are primary sources and The Independent Critic is a blog. S0091 (talk) 18:11, 24 February 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: M4V3R1CK32's comment holds. I don't think you'll get anywhere with this one, sorry - she's only been acting since the pandemic, and not in really major roles, so I don't think you're likely to find more coverage than this (yet). asilvering (talk) 00:18, 1 September 2023 (UTC)
- Comment: I've reviewed this pretty closely and reviewed it against the guidelines for people generally and entertainers specifically and I cannot decide if it meets the guidelines. Starting with guidelines for entertainers, yes, technically Norberg had roles in three notable films/short films. However, it's not clear a) the extent of those roles (were they significant, as the guideline states, or were they bit roles?) b) if short films merit the same level of consideration as feature-length films (apologies if this discussion has already been held, I have not found it if so, films are not my area of expertise on Wikipedia), and c) if these "notable" films actually deserve that title. The A Family Affair article is completely unsourced. The current content of the stub would not meet WP:NFILM even if it had sources. We All Die Alone may or may not meet the release guidelines. Yes, it was played around a festival circuit, but I don't know if that counts as "widely distributed" or not, or if that circuit is notable enough. The article also only lists one review from Film Threat, which may or may not be the kind of "nationally known reviewer" the guideline was intended to require. It would be great if another editor from WP:FILM or WP:ACTOR could chime in on those points.Adalynn was released straight to VOD and can be bought or rented, but not streamed. Here again, I don't know if this counts as "wide distribution". Technically anyone with an Internet connection could get it on Amazon, so maybe? But does that mean every 10 minute video on YouTube has wide distribution? I'd love another thought from a more experienced film WikiProject editor. Descriptions of Norberg as being an "ensemble" cast member rather than a lead in Adalynn and We All Die Alone also make me question the significance of her roles in those films. And of course, two episodes in SVU is a bit role and not significant. Moving to guidelines for people, there's only one example of WP:SIGCOV of Norberg listed, the Lake County Journal (listed as Shaw Local) article. The others are film reviews that mention her only in passing or are primary sources. Her Rotten Tomatoes profile is pretty barren too. So this draft might not meet WP:ENT and definitely doesn't meet WP:BIO. If this was a draft for anyone not an entertainer, I would decline it instead of puzzling over pages of policy trying to find a way to accept it. My gut says to decline it but I'd love to build a little more consensus. M4V3R1CK32 (talk) 21:48, 18 July 2023 (UTC)
Suzana Norberg | |
|---|---|
.png) Norberg in 2019 | |
| Born | |
| Occupations |
|
| Known for | |
| Notable credits | |
| Awards | 2022 Best Supporting Actress Oceanside International Film Festival |
Suzana Norberg is an American actress and screenwriter who created the film Libertyville and appeared in the films Adalynn and Debunkers, Inc.. She won Best Supporting Actress at Oceanside International Film Festival and several ensemble awards for We All Die Alone including Downtown Film Festival Los Angeles.