 | Review waiting, please be patient.
This may take 2 months or more, since drafts are reviewed in no specific order. There are 1,284 pending submissions waiting for review.
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
Reviewer tools
|
| Submission declined on 30 August 2024 by Saqib (talk). This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
This draft has been resubmitted and is currently awaiting re-review. |  |
| Submission declined on 23 August 2024 by Utopes (talk). This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject. Declined by Utopes 38 days ago. | |
| Submission declined on 23 August 2024 by Saqib (talk). This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources. This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are: Declined by Saqib 38 days ago.
| |
| Submission declined on 22 August 2024 by CNMall41 (talk). This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are: Declined by CNMall41 39 days ago.
| |
Comment: The entire rest of the article beyond the history section is unsourced. A source should be found, or the content be removed. Wikipedia is not a means of promotion. Utopes (talk / cont) 21:53, 23 August 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: Majority of content is not sourced. Will need reliable secondary sources to show notability. Also, please see WP:INCITE for help with referencing. CNMall41 (talk) 16:58, 22 August 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: It looks like you're getting closer on the notability issue, but the language is still very unencyclopedic. You cannot say something good (or bad) about the school without directly quoting a reliable, independent, secondary source. You cannot say good (or bad) things about the subject of the draft in Wikipedia's voice. Your writing has to be from a neutral point of view. If you have a close connection to the subject or have been employed to write this draft, that may be difficult and also requires you to make certain disclosures that are outlined at the links in this sentence. As counterintuitive as it seems, when you write an encyclopedia article, you are not writing about the subject. Instead, you are reporting on what others have written about the subject. 4.37.252.50 (talk) 18:40, 5 September 2024 (UTC)
 | This article has multiple issues. Please help improve it or discuss these issues on the talk page. (Learn how and when to remove these messages)
|
Tahaffuz Darsgah is recognized as Pakistan's first educational institution specifically designed to cater to the transgender community..[1] Located near Jallo Park in Lahore, Punjab, the school was established in 2024 as part of a broader initiative to provide inclusive education and vocational training to transgender individuals.[2] The institution was founded through a partnership between the UK Curriculum and Accreditation Body (UKCAB), a registered charity in England & Wales[3], and the Punjab Police. Tahaffuz Darsgah is a response to the need for specialized educational facilities that address the unique challenges faced by transgender individuals in Pakistan.
- ^ "In a first, Punjab opens school for transgender children". www.geo.tv. Retrieved 2024-08-27.
- ^ Nabil (2024-03-30). "From the fringe to inclusive growth | The Express Tribune". tribune.com.pk. Retrieved 2024-08-27.
- ^ "Empowering Transgender Education in Lahore". www.ukcab.org.uk. Retrieved 2024-08-27.