| Submission declined on 2 October 2024 by Mach61 (talk). This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
Once you save your changes using the "Publish changes" button below, you will be able to resubmit your draft for review by pressing the "Resubmit" button that will appear here. | &sq=Envato&lang=en&file=File:AFC-Logo_Decline.svg){kind=logo} |
| Submission declined on 1 November 2023 by MicrobiologyMarcus (talk). This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. Declined by MicrobiologyMarcus 12 months ago. | |
| Submission declined on 30 January 2023 by Compusolus (talk). This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are: Declined by Compusolus 21 months ago.
| |
| Submission declined on 28 October 2022 by DoubleGrazing (talk). This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. Declined by DoubleGrazing 2 years ago. | |
Comment: Only the Rock Hard review is usable for notability purposes; the other sources lack much coverage at all. Also please convert the Rock Hard citation to not use translate.goog and instead link the German site directly. Mach61 03:32, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: Does not demonstrate notability. Take a look at Wikipedia:Notability (music). Does the album reach a chart position at all? microbiologyMarcus (petri dish•growths) 20:23, 1 November 2023 (UTC)
- Comment: Sources still don't demonstrate significant coverage and notability. Compusolus (talk) 00:19, 30 January 2023 (UTC)
- Comment: Personnel and track listings need sources. Mattdaviesfsic (talk) 18:44, 10 January 2023 (UTC)
- Comment: I don't think the sources cited are sufficient to establish notability. Of the two that offer significant coverage, Spirit of Metal is not considered reliable, and the other, SputnikMusic, isn't alone enough. The other sources merely document the existence of this album, and we need more than that.Please note that the draft title currently forwards to the article on the band. There was a stub/article earlier, but this was replaced with a redirect because it was deemed not notable enough. If we want to replace that redir with a new article, that article has to demonstrate notability beyond any doubt; something at best borderline won't do. DoubleGrazing (talk) 11:27, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
| The Morning After | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Studio album by | ||||
| Released | October 17, 1988 | |||
| Recorded | August / September 1988 | |||
| Studio | Musiclab Studio, Berlin | |||
| Genre | ||||
| Length | 39:39 58:22(re-release) | |||
| Label | Noise Records | |||
| Producer | Tankard, Harris Johns | |||
| Tankard chronology | ||||
| ||||
The Morning After is the third studio album by German thrash metal band Tankard released on October 17, 1988.[1] It was remastered in 2005 with the bonus Alien EP tracks with the new title The Morning After / Alien, and was re-released again in 2017 with the Noise Records-ReRelease series as a 2CD Deluxe Edition Digipak; The second CD containing the Alien EP.[2] An official music video was made for the title track "The Morning After".
| Review scores | |
|---|---|
| Source | Rating |
| AllMusic |   [3] |
| Rock Hard | 8.5/10 |
| Sputnikmusic | 3.0/5 |
| Metal Storm | 7.6/10 |
- ^ "Tankard - The Morning After". Retrieved 25 July 2022.
- ^ "The Morning After & Alien Deluxe Edition Digipak 2-CD". Retrieved 25 July 2022.
- ^ "Morning After - Tankard". AllMusic. Retrieved 25 July 2022.