Submission declined on 24 October 2024 by ThadeusOfNazereth (talk). This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
Once you save your changes using the "Publish changes" button below, you will be able to resubmit your draft for review by pressing the "Resubmit" button that will appear here. |
Submission declined on 3 August 2024 by Mgp28 (talk). This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs to
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources. Declined by Mgp28 2 months ago. |
Submission declined on 7 May 2024 by DoubleGrazing (talk). This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources. This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs to Declined by DoubleGrazing 5 months ago.
|
Dr. Titus J. Galama, Ph.D., MBA, is an Associate Professor of Economics in the Dornsife Center for Economic and Social Research (CESR) at the University of Southern California and the Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam's School of Business and Economics (SBE). He is also the Director of the USC Center for the Study of Health Inequality and a Research Fellow at the Tinbergen Institute in Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Education Dr. Galama earned his Ph.D. in Astrophysics from the University of Amsterdam (cum laude, 1999), where his work contributed to major discoveries in gamma-ray bursts (GRBs), including his involvement in research on the supernova SN 1998bw. He later completed a Ph.D. in Economics at Tilburg University (cum laude, 2011) and an MBA from INSEAD, France/Singapore (2003).
Research and Contributions Dr. Galama has contributed significantly to both astrophysics and health economics. His astrophysical research on SN 1998bw- a rare Type Ic supernova linked to gamma-ray bursts (GRBs)-was part of groundbreaking work that established the connection between GRBs and supernovae. His discovery was recognized by Science magazine as one of the top scientific discoveries of the late 1990s. His later work in economics focuses on health disparities, applying economic models to understand how socioeconomic factors influence health outcomes across the life cycle.
Notable Work Dr. Galama has been recognized for his interdisciplinary research, which spans economics, astrophysics, and social-science genetics. His health economics research is widely published in academic journals, including the Journal of the European Economic Association and The Economic Journal.
- meet any of the eight academic-specific criteria
- or cite multiple reliable, secondary sources independent of the subject, which cover the subject in some depth
Make sure your draft meets one of the criteria above before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If the subject does not meet any of the criteria, it is not suitable for Wikipedia.