 | Review waiting, please be patient.
This may take 6 weeks or more, since drafts are reviewed in no specific order. There are 1,187 pending submissions waiting for review.
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
Reviewer tools
|
Submission declined on 26 August 2024 by Theroadislong (talk).
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
This draft has been resubmitted and is currently awaiting re-review. |  |
| Submission declined on 8 September 2023 by Stuartyeates (talk). This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are: Declined by Stuartyeates 14 months ago.
| |
| Submission declined on 13 July 2023 by Artem.G (talk). This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources. Declined by Artem.G 16 months ago. | |
| Submission declined on 19 June 2023 by Rich Smith (talk). This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are: Declined by Rich Smith 17 months ago.
| |
| Submission declined on 16 June 2023 by Greenman (talk). This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies. Declined by Greenman 17 months ago. | |
Comment: I was asked by email to look at this again. I can't access some sources due to "disable your adblocker" messages but everything else is articles that quote company officers. Stuartyeates (talk) 18:07, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
- Comment: Sources are not even close. Stuartyeates (talk) 19:15, 8 September 2023 (UTC)
- Comment: No reliable sources. The ones given are either PR fluff or trivial reporting - RichT|C|E-Mail 21:32, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
Yellowfin is a Business Intelligence Software company specializing in Embedded Analytics solutions headquartered in Austin, Texas. It has been part of Idera, Inc. since January 2022.[1][2]
- ^ Avidon, Eric (31 Jan 2022). "Yellowfin acquired by B2B software specialist Idera". TechTarget.
- ^ Dee, Katie (February 1, 2022). "SD Times news digest: Idera acquires Yellowfin; Fastly launches Fastly Academy; Jellyfish raises $71 million in Series C". SD Times.
- in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
- reliable
- secondary
- strictly independent of the subject
Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.