Northern Gateway West Line | |
---|---|
Location | |
Country | Canada |
Province |
|
General direction | West |
From | Bruderheim, Alberta |
To | Kitimat, British Columbia |
General information | |
Type | Diluted bitumen |
Owner | Enbridge |
Technical information | |
Length | 1,177 km (731 mi) |
Maximum discharge | 0.525 million barrels per day (~2.62×10 7 t/a) |
Diameter | 36 in (914 mm) |
Northern Gateway East Line | |
---|---|
Location | |
Country | Canada |
Province |
|
General direction | East |
From | Kitimat, British Columbia |
To | Bruderheim, Alberta |
General information | |
Type | Natural Gas Condensate |
Owner | Enbridge |
Technical information | |
Length | 1,177 km (731 mi) |
Maximum discharge | 193,000 barrels (30,700 m3) of condensate per day |
Diameter | 20 in (508 mm) |
The Enbridge Northern Gateway Pipelines were a planned-but-never-built project for a twin pipeline from Bruderheim, Alberta, to Kitimat, British Columbia. The project was active from the mid-2000s to 2016. The eastbound pipeline would have imported natural gas condensate, and the westbound pipeline would have exported diluted bitumen from the Athabasca oil sands to a marine terminal in Kitimat for transportation to Asian markets via oil tankers. The project would have also included terminal facilities with "integrated marine infrastructure at tidewater to accommodate loading and unloading of oil and condensate tankers, and marine transportation of oil and condensate."[1] The CA$7.9 billion[2] project was first proposed in the mid-2000s but was postponed several times. The project plan was developed by Enbridge Inc., a Canadian crude oil and liquids pipeline and storage company.
When completed, the pipeline and terminal would have provided 104 permanent operating positions created within the company and 113 positions with the associated marine services.[3] First Nations groups, many municipalities, including the Union of BC Municipalities, environmentalists and oil sands opponents, among others, denounced the project because of the environmental, economic, social and cultural risks posed by the pipeline. Proponents argued that the pipeline would have provided Indigenous communities with equity ownership, employment, community trust and stewardship programs. The Federal Court of Appeal ultimately ruled that consultation with First Nations was inadequate and overturned the approval.
The proposal was heavily criticized by Indigenous peoples.[4] Groups like the Yinka Dene Alliance organized to campaign against the project. In December 2010, 66 First Nations bands in British Columbia, including many along the proposed pipeline route, signed the Save the Fraser Declaration in opposition to the project, and 40 more signed since that time.[5] The proposal was also opposed by numerous non-governmental organizations, which cite previous spills,[6] concerns over oil sands expansion, and associated risks in transportation.[2]
In June 2014 the Northern Gateway pipeline project was approved by the federal government, subject to 209 conditions.[2] In 2015 the CBC questioned the silence concerning the Northern Gateway project and suggested that Enbridge might have quietly shelved the project.[2] Upon taking office in 2015, Prime Minister of Canada Justin Trudeau banned oil tanker traffic on the north coast of British Columbia, effectively killing the project.[7] On 29 November 2016 Trudeau officially rejected plans for the pipelines.