Esegels (aka Izgil (Old Turkic: đ°đ°đ° ), ĂsĂ€gel, Askel, Askil, Ishkil, Izgil) were an Oghur Turkic dynastic tribe in the Middle Ages who joined and would be assimilated into the Volga Bulgars.
Numerous records about Esegels in sources and works of many languages across the span of the Eurasia left numerous variations of their name.[1] M. RĂ€sĂ€nen suggested Uralo-Altai etymology of this word: Es-kil, Es-gil "Old city",[2] Gumilyov initially linked the Izgils to the Sijie (æç») of the Toquz Oghuz;[3][4] only to later re-identify Izgils with Xijie (ć„ç”), another Tiele tribe.[5][6] However, Zuev (2002) distinguished Izgil (> Ch. *a-siÉk-kiet éżæç” > Axijie, a Western Tujue tribe according to Chinese sources[7][8][a]) from Igil (> Ch. *ÉŁiei-kiet ć„ç” > Xijie, a Tiele tribe[10]) though Zuev controversially links the Igils ć„ç” to the Bulgarian clan Uokil and the Indo-European-speaking Augaloi[11] in Transoxania.[12]
RĂłna-Tas proposes an Iranian origin: Western Old Turkic Askil, ĂsĂ€gĂ€l < ÀΞÀgĂ€l < haΞyaka arya "the very aliens" (cf. Ossetian ĂŠcĂŠgĂŠlon < ĂŠcĂŠgĂŠ + ĂŠlon).[13] However, TatĂĄr (2012) disagrees that Ossetian ĂŠcĂŠgĂŠlon was cognate with ĂskĂ€l, as the expected Hungarian cognate to Ossetian would have been **ĂÄgĂŠl (Hg. **Ecsgel), not szĂ©kely, the SzĂ©kely people's endonym which, in TatĂĄr's opinion, might have developed from Ăskil with these sound-changes: loss of first vowel before or after another vowel's appearance between /s/ & /k/, not in Hungarian but in a foreign source language. TatĂĄr reconstructs *Ăskil as the Western Turkic tribe's endonym, containing Turkic plural and generalizational suffix -GIl[14] and Iranian tribal name As; she proposes that the As had been originally part of Iranian-speaking Massagetae and joined the Alans in the 1st century CE, yet one group later split from the Iranian-speaking As community, became allies or subjects of the Turks and subsequently Turkicized as Ăskils, only to later become enemies of the Second Turkic Khaganate.[15] TatĂĄr also remarks that if szĂ©kely had developed from ĂŠcĂŠgĂŠl (even in a Turkic source language and not Hungarian), "the Volga Bulgarian Ăskils and the SzĂ©kelys must be of different origin because ĂŠcĂŠgĂŠl is not the source of Askil."[16]
Zuev proposes connections with the ÄxÄ«jiÄ of the Nushibi half of the Ten Arrows tribal confederation of the Western Turkic Khaganate, and the Xionite personal name Askil/Askel, as mentioned in the Chronography of Theophanes the Confessor (760â818):
"the same month (July 563) ambassadors of Askil/Askel, the king of Hermihions (Greek ÎÏΌηÏÎčÎżÎœÎčÎżÎœÏÎœ; Lat. Ermechionorum), a tribe living among barbarians near the ocean, came to Constantinople".[17]
Zuev (2004)[18] summarized scholarly opinions on the link between Izgils and Turkic-speaking tribes mentioned by sources in Chinese:
A Chinese annalistic account in New Book of Tang about the Western Turkic Khaganate in 651 CE listed five west tribes collectively as Nushibi (ćŒ©ć€±çą) and noted that KĂŒl-Irkin (éäżæ€ QuĂš-sĂŹjÄ«n), the leader of first tribe, ÄxÄ«jiÄ (éżæç”), (whom Zuev identifies as Esegels) "was most prosperous and strong, the number of his soldiers reached several tens of thousands".[22][23]
Arab ambassador Ibn Fadlan, who visited Itil (Volga) banks in the 921â922, mentioned in his journal the Bulgarian tribe Askel, besides the Bulgars proper, the Suvars (Savan), the Bersula, and the Barandzhar.[24][25] Persian ethnographer Ahmad ibn Rustah listed three branches of the Volga Bulghars: "the first branch was called Bersula, the second Esegel, and the third Oghuz".[26] The ancient ruins of the city belonging to the Askel tribe are located in AĆlı[27]
Among other writers who mentioned Esegels, the Persian âGeographyâ of 982 named Ishkils as one of three Bulgarian tribes, who were constantly conflicting among themselves.[28] Gardizi, the author of the composition Zain al-ahbar (mid-11th century), wrote: "Between possessions of Bulgars and possessions of Eskels, who also belong to Bulgars, is a Magyar area. These Magyars are also a TĂŒrkic tribe".[29] Constantine Porphyrogenitus wrote that endoethnonym of the "Magyar TĂŒrks" was Savartoiaskaloi, i.e. Savart (Suvar/Sabir) and Eskel.[30] Zuev summarized that "It is held that Eskels (Esegels) merged with Hungarians (Magyars). Zuev proposes that the ethnographic group SzĂ©kely (also known as Szekler) are Esegels' descendants."[31] However, RĂłna-Tas rejected identification of Esegels with SzĂ©kely, as well as the link between the names Esegels and Chigils, on historical and phonological grounds.[32]
{{cite book}}
: |work=
ignored (help)CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link)
Cite error: There are <ref group=lower-alpha>
tags or {{efn}}
templates on this page, but the references will not show without a {{reflist|group=lower-alpha}}
template or {{notelist}}
template (see the help page).