Garner v. Louisiana | |
---|---|
Argued October 18–19, 1961 Decided December 11, 1961 | |
Full case name | John Burrell Garner, et al. v. State of Louisiana, Mary Briscoe, et al. |
Citations | 368 U.S. 157 (more) 82 S. Ct. 248; 7 L. Ed. 2d 207; 1961 U.S. LEXIS 28 |
Case history | |
Prior | Certiorari to the Supreme Court of Louisiana, 365 U.S. 840 (1961). |
Holding | |
The convictions were so totally devoid of evidentiary support as to violate the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. | |
Court membership | |
| |
Case opinions | |
Majority | Warren, joined by unanimous |
Concurrence | Frankfurter |
Concurrence | Douglas |
Concurrence | Harlan |
Laws applied | |
U.S. Const. amends. I, XIV |
Garner v. Louisiana, 368 U.S. 157 (1961), was a landmark case argued by Thurgood Marshall before the US Supreme Court. On December 11, 1961, the court unanimously ruled that Louisiana could not convict peaceful sit-in protesters who refused to leave dining establishments under the state's "disturbing the peace" laws.[1][2]