Houla massacre | |
---|---|
Part of the Syrian Civil War | |
Location | Houla, Homs, Syria |
Coordinates | 34°53′7″N 36°30′42″E / 34.88528°N 36.51167°E |
Date | May 25, 2012 |
Deaths | 108, including 25 men, 34 women and 49 children (per U.N. observers)[1] |
Injured | 300[2] |
Perpetrators | Shabiha and Syrian military (concluded by UN investigations)[3] |
The Houla massacre (Arabic: مجزرة الحولة) was a mass murder of civilians by Syrian government forces that took place on May 25, 2012, in the midst of the Syrian Civil War, in the town of Taldou, in the Houla Region of Syria, a string of towns northwest of Homs. According to the United Nations, 108 people were killed, including 34 women and 49 children.[4] While a small proportion of the deaths appeared to have resulted from artillery and tank rounds used against Taldou, the U.N. later announced that most of the massacre's victims had been "summarily executed in two separate incidents".[5] UN investigators have reported that some witnesses and survivors stated that the massacre was committed by pro-government Shabiha.[4] In August 2012 UN investigators released a report which stated that it was likely that Syrian troops and Shabiha militia were responsible for the massacre, concluding that: "On the basis of available evidence, the commission has a reasonable basis to believe that the perpetrators of the deliberate killing of civilians, at both the Abdulrazzak and Al-Sayed family locations, were aligned to the Government. It rests this conclusion on its understanding of access to the crime sites, the loyalties of the victims, the security layout in the area including the position of the government’s water authority checkpoint and the consistent testimonies of victims and witnesses with direct knowledge of the events. This conclusion is bolstered by the lack of credible information supporting other possibilities."[6]
The Syrian government alleged that Al-Qaeda terrorist groups were responsible for the killings, and that Houla residents were warned not to speak publicly by opposition forces.[7][8] This account received support from a report published by the Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung,[9][10]but is contested by most media coverage[11] and by the report published by the United Nations Human Rights Council (UNHRC) in August 2012.[6]
Channel 4 News reported that Houla residents stated that the Syrian military and government-hired Shabiha were the perpetrators of the massacre, as claimed by opposition groups.[12][13] Townspeople described how Shabiha, who were thought to be men from Shia/Alawite villages to the south and west of Houla (Kabu and Felleh were named repeatedly) entered the town after several hours of shelling. According to one eyewitness, the killers had written Shia slogans on their foreheads (the Alawi faith is a Shia sect).[14][15]
The fifteen nations of the U.N. Security Council unanimously condemned the Syrian government for firing heavy weapons at civilians.[1] The U.S., U.K., and eleven other nations jointly expelled Syrian ambassadors and diplomats from their territories.[16][17]
On June 1, 2012, 41 out of 47 countries in the UNHRC supported a resolution condemning "in the strongest possible terms such an outrageous use of force against the civilian population".[18] The resolution, which blamed Syrian government troops and pro-government militias,[19] instructed an expert panel to conduct an "international, transparent, independent and prompt investigation".[18][20] Russia, China and Cuba voted against the resolution, with Uganda and Ecuador abstaining, and the Philippines was absent during the vote.[18] On June 27, the UNHRC published a preliminary report on rights violations in Syria.[6] The report noted that the commission had "yet to be afforded access to the country," which "substantially hampered the investigation, and its findings should be viewed in that light."[21] The report states that "with the available evidence" the Commission of Inquiry (CoI) could not rule out any of three possible perpetrators, but that "while the CoI could not rule out the possibility of anti-Government fighters being responsible for the killing, it was considered unlikely."[21] In August 2012, following continued investigations focusing on identifying the perpetrators, a report published by the UNHRC concluded there was a reasonable basis to believe the perpetrators were aligned to the Syrian government.[6]
faz1
was invoked but never defined (see the help page).faz2
was invoked but never defined (see the help page).spiegel
was invoked but never defined (see the help page).