| Hunter v Canary Wharf Ltd | |
|---|---|
 One Canada Square, the building which triggered this case. | |
| Court | House of Lords |
| Decided | 24 April 1997 |
| Citations | [1997] UKHL 14, [1997] AC 655, [1997] 2 WLR 684, [1997] 2 All ER 426, [1997] 2 FLR 342, [1997] Fam Law 601 |
| Court membership | |
| Judges sitting | Lord Goff of Chieveley, Lord Lloyd of Berwick, Lord Hoffmann, Lord Cooke of Thorndon, Lord Hope of Craighead |
| Keywords | |
| Nuisance, protected property rights | |
Hunter v Canary Wharf Ltd [1997] UKHL 14 is an English tort law case on the subject of private nuisance. Several hundred claimants alleged that Canary Wharf Ltd, in constructing One Canada Square, had caused nuisance to them by impairing their television signal.[1] The House of Lords held unanimously that such interference could not amount to an actionable nuisance; the nuisance was equivalent to loss of a view, or of a prospect, which had never previously been actionable.
- ^ [1997] AC 655, p. 663