Kolender v. Lawson | |
---|---|
Argued November 8, 1982 Decided May 2, 1983 | |
Full case name | Kolender, Chief of Police of San Diego, et al. v. Edward Lawson |
Citations | 461 U.S. 352 (more) 103 S. Ct. 1855; 75 L. Ed. 2d 903 |
Case history | |
Prior | 658 F.2d 1362 (9th Cir. 1981) |
Holding | |
The statute, as drafted and as construed by the state court, is unconstitutionally vague on its face within the meaning of the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment by failing to clarify what is contemplated by the requirement that a suspect provide a "credible and reliable" identification. | |
Court membership | |
| |
Case opinions | |
Majority | O'Connor, joined by Burger, Brennan, Marshall, Blackmun, Powell, Stevens |
Concurrence | Brennan |
Dissent | White, joined by Rehnquist |
Laws applied | |
U.S. Const. amend. XIV |
Kolender v. Lawson, 461 U.S. 352 (1983),[1] is a United States Supreme Court case concerning the constitutionality of vague laws that allow police to demand that "loiterers" and "wanderers" provide "credible and reliable" identification.