Newberry v. United States | |
---|---|
Argued January 7, 10, 1921 Decided May 2, 1921 | |
Full case name | Newberry, et al. v. United States |
Citations | 256 U.S. 232 (more) 41 S. Ct. 469; 65 L. Ed. 913; 1921 U.S. LEXIS 1632 |
Case history | |
Prior | Error to the District Count of the U.S. for the Western District of Michigan |
Holding | |
Authority to control party primaries or conventions for designating candidates not bestowed on Congress by U.S. Constitution. | |
Court membership | |
| |
Case opinions | |
Majority | McReynolds, joined by Holmes, Day, Van Devanter; McKenna (in part) |
Concurrence | McKenna (in part) |
Concur/dissent | White |
Concur/dissent | Pitney, joined by Brandeis, Clarke |
Laws applied | |
Federal Corrupt Practices Act; 1913 Mich. Pub. Acts 109, Sec. 1; U.S. Const. Art. I, Sec. 4; U.S. Const., 17th Amend. | |
Superseded by | |
United States v. Classic (1941) |
Newberry v. United States, 256 U.S. 232 (1921), is a decision by the United States Supreme Court which held that the United States Constitution did not grant the United States Congress the authority to regulate political party primaries or nomination processes.[1] The court struck down 1911 amendments to the Federal Corrupt Practices Act which placed spending limits on candidate and political election committee spending in primaries or other nomination processes for federal office.