Porter v Magill

Porter v Magill
CourtHouse of Lords
Decided13 December 2001
Citation[2001] UKHL 67
Court membership
Judges sittingLord Bingham of Cornhill, Lord Steyn, Lord Hope of Craighead, Lord Hobhouse of Wood-borough, Lord Scott of Foscote

Porter v Magill [2001] UKHL 67 is a UK administrative law case decided by the House of Lords which arose out of the Homes for votes scandal involving Dame Shirley Porter.

Under English law, the test for establishing bias was set out in Porter v Magill – whether a "fair minded and informed observer", having considered the facts, would conclude that there was a "real possibility" of bias.[1]

  1. ^ "Perceptions of Bias | White & Case LLP". www.whitecase.com. Retrieved 19 January 2020.