| R v Jogee | |
|---|---|
 | |
| Court | Supreme Court of the United Kingdom |
| Full case name | R v Jogee (Appellant); Ruddock (Appellant) v The Queen (Respondent) (Jamaica) |
| Argued | 27–29 October 2015 |
| Decided | 18 February 2016 |
| Neutral citation | [2016] UKSC 8 |
| Case history | |
| Prior history | [2013] EWCA Crim 1433 |
| Holding | |
| The rule regarding joint enterprise has been wrongly interpreted since the case of Chan Wing-Siu v The Queen [1985] AC 168. The correct position is that the defendant must intentionally act or encourage the principal to act with the requisite intent in order to be found liable for the same offence. | |
| Case opinions | |
| Majority | Lord Neuberger, Lady Hale, Lord Hughes, Lord Toulson and Lord Thomas |
| Area of law | |
| Joint enterprise | |
Preview warning: Page using Template:Infobox court case with unknown parameter "Reversed"
R v Jogee [2016] UKSC 8 was a 2016 judgment of the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom that reversed previous case law on joint enterprise. The Supreme Court delivered its ruling jointly with the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council, which was considering an appeal from Jamaica, Ruddock v The Queen [2016] UKPC 7.