R v Miller | |
---|---|
Court | House of Lords |
Full case name | Regina (Appellant) v Miller (Respondent) |
Decided | 17 March 1982 |
Citations |
|
Transcript | transcript at BAILII[1] |
Cases cited | R v Caldwell ([1982] A.C. 341) |
Legislation cited | Offences Against the Person Act 1861 s. 47, Criminal Appeal Act 1968 (c.19) s.33(2), Criminal Damage Act 1971 (c.48) s.1, Criminal Damage Act 1971 (c.48) s.1(1), Criminal Damage Act 1971 (c.48) s.1(2), Criminal Damage Act 1971 (c.48) s.4, Cruelty to Animals Act 1849 s.2, Indecency with Children Act 1960 (c.33), Sexual Offences (Amendment) Act 1976 (c.82) s.1, Theft Act 1978 (c.31), Theft Act 1968 (c.60) s.15, Theft Act 1968 (c.60) s.16, |
Court membership | |
Judges sitting | |
Keywords | |
Omissions; Arson; Failure to act |
R v Miller (case citation: [1982] UKHL 6; [1983] 2 AC 161) is an English criminal law case demonstrating how actus reus can be interpreted to be not only an act, but a failure to act.