| Representation of Sheppard re Powell | |
|---|---|
 | |
| Court | Court of Appeal |
| Full case name | Representation of Sheppard re Powell |
| Decided | 30 March 2021 |
| Case history | |
| Prior action | Representation of Powell (2018)[1] |
| Appealed from | Royal Court |
| Case opinions | |
| The Clameur de Haro cannot be used to prevent court eviction orders being issued | |
| Decision by | Sir William Bailhache |
| Concurrence | James McNeill George Bompas |
| Keywords | |
| Clameur de Haro | |
Representation of Sheppard re Powell is a Jersey Court of Appeal case relating to eviction injunctions. The case resolved around Powell raising a clameur de haro to prevent eviction and Sheppard appealed against the subsequent automatic injunction preventing eviction. The court ruled that a clameur could not be used to block court orders and fined Powell £50 for incorrect usage.
- ^ "Representation of Sheppard re Powell". Bailii. Retrieved 2021-05-19.