 | This article is written like a personal reflection, personal essay, or argumentative essay that states a Wikipedia editor's personal feelings or presents an original argument about a topic. (October 2014) |
| Original title | Über Ressentiment und moralisches Werturteil |
|---|---|
| Language | German |
Publication date | 1912 |
| Text | Ressentiment at Enciclopedia Mercabá |
&sq=Envato&lang=en&file=File:Maxschelerphoto.jpg)
| This article is part of a series on |
| Conservatism in Germany |
|---|
&sq=Envato&lang=en&file=File:Wappen_Deutsches_Reich_-_Reichsadler_1889.svg) |
Ressentiment (full German title: Über Ressentiment und moralisches Werturteil) is a 1912 book by Max Scheler (1874–1928), who is sometimes considered to have been both the most respected and neglected of the major early 20th century German Continental philosophers in the phenomenological tradition.[1] His observations and insights concerning "a special form of human hate" [2] and related social and psychological phenomenon furnished a descriptive basis for his philosophical concept of "Ressentiment".[3] As a widely recognized convention, the French spelling of this term has been retained in philosophical circles so as to preserve a broad sense of discursive meaning and application.[4] Scheler died unexpectedly of a heart attack in 1928 leaving a vast body of unfinished works. Extrapolations from his thoughts have always since piqued interest and discussion on a variety of topics.[5] His works were on the Nazi book burn list.
As a concept belonging to the study of ethics, Ressentiment represents the antithetical process of Scheler's emotively informed non-formal ethics of values.[6] But Ressentiment can also be said to be, at once, Scheler's darkest as well as his most psychological and sociological of topics, foreshadowing many later findings in those particular social sciences.
Folk wisdom comes closest to Scheler's meaning by recognizing Ressentiment as a self-defeating turn of mind which is non-productive and ultimately a waste of time and energy. Maturity informs most of us that sustained hatred hurts the hater far more than the object of our hate. Sustained hatred enslaves by preventing emotional growth from progressing beyond the sense of pain having been precipitated, in some way, by whom or what is hated (i.e., another person, group or class of persons).[7]
- ^ Scheler (1973c), Editor's introduction, pp. xi–xiv
- ^ Frings (2001), p. 145
- ^ Scheler (1972a)
- ^ Frings (1996), p. 53
- ^ Frings (2001), p. 11
- ^ Scheler (1973a)
- ^ Frings (1996), pp. 53–54