Rostker v. Goldberg | |
---|---|
Argued March 24, 1981 Decided June 25, 1981 | |
Full case name | Bernard Rostker, Director of Selective Service, et al. v. Robert L. Goldberg, et al. |
Citations | 453 U.S. 57 (more) 101 S. Ct. 2646; 69 L. Ed. 2d 478; 1981 U.S. LEXIS 126 |
Case history | |
Prior | Goldberg v. Rostker, 509 F. Supp. 586 (E.D. Pa. 1980) |
Holding | |
The Act's registration provisions do not violate the Fifth Amendment. Congress acted well within its constitutional authority to raise and regulate armies and navies when it authorized the registration of men and not women. | |
Court membership | |
| |
Case opinions | |
Majority | Rehnquist, joined by Burger, Stewart, Blackmun, Powell, Stevens |
Dissent | White, joined by Brennan |
Dissent | Marshall, joined by Brennan |
Laws applied | |
U.S. Const. amend. V., Military Selective Service Act (50 U.S.C. 451 et seq. (1976 ed. and Supp. III)) |
Rostker v. Goldberg, 453 U.S. 57 (1981), is a decision of the Supreme Court of the United States holding that the practice of requiring only men to register for the draft was constitutional. After extensive hearings, floor debate and committee sessions on the matter, the United States Congress reauthorized the law, as it had previously been, to apply to men only. Several attorneys, including Robert L. Goldberg, subsequently challenged the Act as gender distinction. In a 6–3 decision, the Supreme Court upheld the Act, holding that its gender distinction was not a violation of the equal protection component of the Due Process Clause of the Fifth Amendment.[1]