Stanford v. Kentucky | |
---|---|
Argued March 7, 1989 Decided June 26, 1989 | |
Full case name | Kevin Stanford v. State of Kentucky (No. 87-5765); together with Heath Wilkins v. State of Missouri (No. 87-6026) |
Citations | 492 U.S. 361 (more) 109 S. Ct. 2969; 106 L. Ed. 2d 306; 1989 U.S. LEXIS 3195 |
Case history | |
Prior | Stanford v. Commonwealth, 734 S.W.2d 781 (Ky. 1987); cert. granted, 488 U.S. 887 (1988); State v. Wilkins, 736 S.W.2d 409 (Mo. 1987); cert. granted, 487 U.S. 1233 (1988). |
Holding | |
The judgments are affirmed. The imposition of capital punishment on an individual for a crime committed at 16 or 17 years of age does not constitute cruel and unusual punishment under the Eighth Amendment. | |
Court membership | |
| |
Case opinions | |
Majority | Scalia, joined by Rehnquist, White, O'Connor, Kennedy (parts I, II, III, and IV-A) |
Plurality | Scalia, joined by Rehnquist, White, Kennedy (parts IV-B and V) |
Concurrence | O'Connor (in part and in judgment) |
Dissent | Brennan, joined by Marshall, Blackmun, Stevens |
Laws applied | |
U.S. Const. amends. VIII, XIV | |
Overruled by | |
Roper v. Simmons, 543 U.S. 551 (2005) |
Stanford v. Kentucky, 492 U.S. 361 (1989), was a United States Supreme Court case that sanctioned the imposition of the death penalty on offenders who were at least 16 years of age at the time of the crime.[1] This decision came one year after Thompson v. Oklahoma, in which the Court had held that a 15-year-old offender could not be executed because to do so would constitute cruel and unusual punishment. In 2003, the Governor of Kentucky Paul E. Patton commuted the death sentence of Kevin Stanford, an action followed by the Supreme Court two years later in Roper v. Simmons overruling Stanford and holding that all juvenile offenders are exempt from the death penalty.