This article needs additional citations for verification. (June 2018) |
State v. Abbott, 36 N.J. 63, 174 A.2d 881 (1961),[1] is a landmark case in the American legal doctrine of retreat. In it, the New Jersey Supreme Court unanimously adopted a duty to retreat—a legal requirement that a threatened person cannot stand one's ground and apply lethal force in self-defense, but must instead retreat to a place of safety.[2] This retreat rule is an exception to the right of self-defense.
The duty to retreat, as endorsed in Abbott, is in direct opposition to the “true man” doctrine articulated in Erwin v. State, 29 Ohio St. 186 (1876). This common law view holds the law “will not permit the taking of [human life] to repel mere trespass, . . . but a true man who is without fault is not obliged to fly from an assailant.”[3]
Most states at the time of Abbott followed the no-retreat “true man” approach; since Abbott, it has been in major flux.[4]
State v. Abbott | |
---|---|
Court | New Jersey Supreme Court |
Full case name | State of New Jersey, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Frank Abbott, Defendant-Appellant |
Argued | September 13, 1961 |
Decided | November 6, 1961 |
Citations | 36 N.J. 63; 174 A.2d 881 |
Case history | |
Prior actions | State v. Abbott, 64 N.J. Super. 191, 165 A.2d 537 (Super. Ct. App. Div. 1960); 34 N.J. 176, 167 A.2d 676 (1961) |
Court membership | |
Chief judge | Joseph Weintraub |
Associate judges | Nathan L. Jacobs, John J. Francis, Haydn Proctor, Frederick Wilson Hall, C. Thomas Schettino, Vincent S. Haneman |
Case opinions | |
Decision by | Weintraub |
Keywords | |
{{cite book}}
: CS1 maint: others (link)