Synchronicity

This article is about the Jungian concept. For other uses, see Synchronicity (disambiguation).
"Acausal" redirects here. For the concept in systems theory, see Acausal system.

Part of a series on
Psychology
Basic psychology
Applied psychology
Concepts
Lists

Synchronicity (German: Synchronizität) is a concept introduced by analytical psychiatrist Carl Jung to describe events that coincide in time and appear meaningfully related, yet lack a discoverable causal connection.[1] Jung held this was a healthy function of the mind, that can become harmful within psychosis.[2][3]

Jung developed the theory as a hypothetical noncausal principle serving as the intersubjective or philosophically objective connection between these seemingly meaningful coincidences. After coining the term in the late 1920s[4] Jung developed the concept with physicist Wolfgang Pauli through correspondence and in their 1952 work The Interpretation of Nature and the Psyche.[5][6][7][8] This culminated in the Pauli–Jung conjecture.[9][10][11][12][13] Jung and Pauli's view was that, just as causal connections can provide a meaningful understanding of the psyche and the world, so too may acausal connections.[14]

A 2016 study found 70% of therapists agreed synchronicity experiences could be useful for therapy. Analytical psychologists hold that individuals must understand the compensatory meaning of these experiences to "enhance consciousness rather than merely build up superstitiousness". However, clients who disclose synchronicity experiences report not being listened to, accepted, or understood. The experience of overabundance of meaningful coincidences can be characteristic of schizophrenic delusion.[15] On the other hand some studies suggest association between experiencing more meaningful coincidences and creativity.[16] Thor Johansen and Nazia Iram Osman write that "prevalent among many scientists, particularly psychologists, studying coincidences, is [the view] that the occurrence of coincidences, as psychologically experienced, is induced by noisy chance occurrences out in the world which are then misconstrued via irrational cognitive biases into unfounded, possibly even paranormal, beliefs in the mind." A study has shown counselors and psychoanalysts were less likely than psychologists to agree chance coincidence was an adequate explanation for synchronicity, while more likely than psychologists to agree that a need for unconscious material to be expressed could be an explanation for synchronicity experiences in the clinical setting.

Jung used synchronicity in arguing for the existence of the paranormal.[17] This idea was explored by Arthur Koestler in The Roots of Coincidence[18] and taken up by the New Age movement. Unlike magical thinking, which believes causally unrelated events to have paranormal causal connection, synchronicity supposes events may be causally unrelated yet have unknown noncausal connection. The objection from a scientific standpoint is that this is neither testable nor falsifiable, so does not fall within empirical study.[19] Scientific scepticism regards it as pseudoscience. Jung stated that synchronicity events are chance occurrences from a statistical point of view, but meaningful in that they may seem to validate paranormal ideas. No empirical studies of synchronicity based on observable mental states and scientific data were conducted by Jung to draw his conclusions, though studies have since been done (see § Studies). While someone may experience a coincidence as meaningful, this alone cannot prove objective meaning to the coincidence. Statistical laws or probability, show how unexpected occurrences can be inevitable or more likely encountered than people assume. These explain coincidences such as synchronicity experiences as chance events which have been misinterpreted by confirmation biases, spurious correlations, or underestimated probability.[20][21]

  1. ^ "synchronicity (n.)". Oxford English Dictionary. Oxford: Oxford University Press. July 2023 [1986]. doi:10.1093/OED/5261833623. Retrieved 21 July 2024. The name given by the Swiss psychologist, C. G. Jung (1875–1961), to the phenomenon of events which coincide in time and appear meaningfully related but have no discoverable causal connection.
  2. ^ Campbell, Frances (2010). "Synchronicity". In Leeming, D.A.; Madden, K.; Marlan, S. (eds.). Encyclopedia of Psychology and Religion. Boston, MA: Springer. pp. 888–889. doi:10.1007/978-0-387-71802-6_678. ISBN 978-0-387-71801-9.
  3. ^ Aziz (1990), p. 191.
  4. ^ Tarnas, Richard (2006). Cosmos and Psyche. New York: Penguin Group. p. 50. ISBN 978-0-670-03292-1.
  5. ^ Jung (1973).
  6. ^ Jung, Carl Gustav, and Wolfgang Ernst Pauli. [1952] 1955. The Interpretation of Nature and the Psyche, translated from German Naturerklärung und Psyche.
  7. ^ Main, Roderick. 2000. "Religion, Science, and Synchronicity". Harvest: Journal for Jungian Studies 46(2):89–107. Archived from the original on 8 December 2006.
  8. ^ Hogenson, G. B. (2008). "The Innermost Kernel: Depth Psychology and Quantum Mechanics. Wolfgang Pauli's Dialogue with C. G. Jung, by Gieser, Suzanne". Journal of Analytical Psychology. 53 (1): 127–136. doi:10.1111/j.1468-5922.2007.00705_1.x.
  9. ^ Atmanspacher, Harald; Fuchs, Christopher A. (2014). "Introduction". In Atmanspacher, Harald; Fuchs, Christopher A. (eds.). The Pauli–Jung Conjecture and Its Impact Today (2017 ed.). Imprint Academic. pp. 1–6. ISBN 978-18454-07599.
  10. ^ Beitman, Bernard D. 2009. "Coincidence Studies: A Freudian Perspective Archived 2017-02-25 at the Wayback Machine". PsycCRITIQUES 55(49): Article 8. doi:10.1037/a0021474. S2CID 147210858.
  11. ^ Diaconis, Persi; Mosteller, Fredrick (1989). "Methods of Studying Coincidences". Journal of the American Statistical Association. 84 (408): 853–861. doi:10.1080/01621459.1989.10478847. JSTOR 2290058.
  12. ^ Jung, Carl G. [1951] 2005. "Synchronicity". Pp. 91–98 in Jung on Synchronicity and the Paranormal, edited by R. Main. London: Taylor & Francis.
  13. ^ Main, Roderick (2014). "Synchronicity and the Problem of Meaning in Science". In Atmanspacher, Harald; Fuchs, Christopher A. (eds.). The Pauli–Jung Conjecture and Its Impact Today (2017 ed.). Imprint Academic. pp. 217–239. ISBN 978-18454-07599.
  14. ^ Bishop, Paul C. (2008). "The Timeliness and Timelessness of the 'Archaic': Analytical Psychology, 'Primordial' Thought, Synchronicity". Journal of Analytical Psychology. 53 (4): 501–23. doi:10.1111/j.1468-5922.2008.00743.x. PMID 18844735.
  15. ^ Morrison, P. D.; Murray, R. M. (2009). "From Real-World Events to Psychosis: The Emerging Neuropharmacology of Delusions". Schizophrenia Bulletin. 35 (4): 668–674. doi:10.1093/schbul/sbp049. PMC 2696381. PMID 19487337.
  16. ^ Rominger, Christian; Fink, Andreas; Perchtold-Stefan, Corinna M. (2024). "Experiencing more meaningful coincidences is associated with more real-life creativity? Insights from three empirical studies". PLOS ONE. 19 (5): e0300121. Bibcode:2024PLoSO..1900121R. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0300121. PMC 11125470. PMID 38787888.
  17. ^ Rushnell, S. (2006). When God winks. Atria Books.
  18. ^ Koestler (1973).
  19. ^ Bonds, Christopher (2002). "Synchronicity". In Shermer, Michael (ed.). The Skeptic Encyclopedia of Pseudoscience. Vol. 1. pp. 240–242. ISBN 9781576076538.
  20. ^ Radford, Benjamin. 4 February 2014. "Synchronicity: Definition & Meaning". Live Science. Retrieved 25 June 2020.
  21. ^ Van Elk, Michiel; Friston, Karl; Bekkering, Harold (2016). "The Experience of Coincidence: An Integrated Psychological and Neurocognitive Perspective". The Challenge of Chance. The Frontiers Collection. pp. 171–185. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-26300-7_9. ISBN 978-3-319-26298-7. S2CID 3642342.