TRW Inc. v. Andrews | |
---|---|
Argued October 9, 2001 Decided November 13, 2001 | |
Full case name | TRW Inc. v. Adelaide Andrews |
Citations | 534 U.S. 19 (more) 122 S. Ct. 441; 151 L. Ed. 2d 339; 70 U.S.L.W. 4006; 2001 Cal. Daily Op. Service 9638; 2001 Daily Journal DAR 12011; 15 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. S 1 |
Case history | |
Prior | Andrews v. Trans Union Corp., 7 F. Supp. 2d 1056 (C.D. Cal. 1998); affirmed in part, reversed in part, Andrews v. TRW Inc., 225 F.3d 1063 (9th Cir. 2000); cert. granted, 532 U.S. 902 (2001). |
Subsequent | Remanded, 289 F.3d 600 (9th Cir. 2001). |
Court membership | |
| |
Case opinions | |
Majority | Ginsburg, joined by Rehnquist, Stevens, O'Connor, Kennedy, Souter, and Breyer |
Concurrence | Scalia (in judgment), joined by Thomas |
Laws applied | |
Fair Credit Reporting Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1681p |
TRW Inc. v. Andrews, 534 U.S. 19 (2001), is a United States Supreme Court decision holding that the discovery rule (that a federal statute of limitations begins to run when a party knows or has reason to know that she was injured) does not apply to the two-year statute of limitations of the Fair Credit Reporting Act.[1][2]