Talk:Abdulla Mohamed

Not sure this article fulfils NPOV, I am hardly an expert on the subject but there is clearly some opinion in the article rather than just facts. Munro90 (talk) 20:54, 1 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I believe this article to be of questionable neutrality. The source which says former President Nasheed suppressed freedom of expression links to a media release by the opposing political party which took power following the [supposedly forced] resignation of former President Nasheed. I have tagged this article as having a NPOV dispute. At the very least, some of the sources cited in this article are biased. Nellie7979 (talk) 17:17, 11 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I did what I could to edit the more egregiously biased sources, but considering the political unrest in the subject country, I believe this article should remain in dispute for some time until more facts are revealed. Nellie7979 (talk) 17:43, 11 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This article is BS. I am calling BS. come on the Washington Times>?? Talk about a Bullshit source. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.22.169.253 (talk) 07:07, 18 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]