Talk:Angie Ballard

Good articleAngie Ballard has been listed as one of the Sports and recreation good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
April 23, 2012Good article nomineeListed
Did You Know
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on December 1, 2011.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that Australian wheelchair racer Angie Ballard was named the Female Athlete of the Games for the 1999 Australia Junior Wheelchair Nationals?
On this day...A fact from this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "On this day..." column on June 6, 2018.

GA Review

[edit]
This review is transcluded from Talk:Angie Ballard/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Hawkeye7 (talk · contribs) 11:53, 22 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Will start the review tomorrow. Hawkeye7 (talk) 11:53, 22 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Great, thanks. 99of9 (talk) 14:37, 22 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria


I know that these articles can be hard to assemble from a patchwork of sources

  1. Is it reasonably well written?
    A. Prose quality:
    B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:
Ballard has held athletics scholarships at the Australian Institute of Sport (1999–2001), You should say "held" rather than "has held", and use "from 1999 to 2001" rather than a range.
also is used twice in the last sentences of the lead
 Done 99of9 (talk) 00:06, 23 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  1. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
    A. References to sources:
    Sources are okay
    B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
All the web sources require an access date, but it is missing from 1, 10 and 29
These should all be in the same format (I would prefer "23 April 2012" form but its up to you)
 Done 99of9 (talk) 00:27, 23 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  1. C. No original research:
  2. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. Major aspects:
Early in her athletics career, Ballard and Louise Sauvage had the same coach Any idea who that was?
 Done Good idea. I found out it was Dawes too, which simplifies the sentence. Also added an extra cite about Sauvage as coach. --99of9 (talk) 01:01, 23 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  1. B. Focused:
  2. Is it neutral?
    Fair representation without bias:
  3. Is it stable?
    No edit wars, etc:
  4. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
    A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
    Appropriately tagged
    B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
  5. Overall:
    Pass or Fail: