Talk:Aspmyra Stadion

Good articleAspmyra Stadion has been listed as one of the Sports and recreation good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
May 28, 2012Good article nomineeListed

GA Review

[edit]
GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:Aspmyra Stadion/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Lemonade51 (talk · contribs) 15:36, 21 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I will be working my way through the article and adding any queries where I see fit. Feel free to make corrections, or correct me as I go along.

Lead
  • "it has a capacity for 7,354 specators" → it holds a capacity of 7,354 specators
  • "The venue has three stands, a modern all-seater with roof" use colon between 'stands' and 'a' instead of a comma as it is being listed.
  • "Immediately south of the venue lays Aspmyra kunstgressbane...", lays ? lies
  • 'top-flight' is hyphenated
  • "and played Cup Winners' Cup matched in the late 1970s at Aspmyra" should be matches
History
  • What does "central competition stadium" mean?

Lemonade51 (talk) 16:48, 23 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed. I will be away from tomorrow afternoon UTC to Monday afternoon UTC and will probably not be able to respond to requests during that period. Arsenikk (talk) 21:31, 24 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • "The upgrades cost NOK 140 million[18] and consisted of a new south stand with a roof, offices and change rooms, and the east stand, which lacked roof.", needs rephrasing.
  • "...and the venue was approved for UEFA matches." needs ref
    • That is cited in ref 1 ("Aspmyra fikk også godkjenning av UEFA for å kunne spille Europacupkamper.", translates to "Aspmyra also received approval from UEFA to play European Cup matches"). The sentence in question and the following one rely on the same ref and the second is a logical continuation of the first, thus I do not see the need to repeat the cite twice. Arsenikk (talk) 15:41, 29 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

On hold. -- Lemonade51 (talk) 13:27, 28 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]