Talk:Atelier Bow-Wow

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Architecture Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Japan: Business and economy / Tokyo Start‑class Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Japan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Japan-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project, participate in relevant discussions, and see lists of open tasks. Current time in Japan: 11:11, October 21, 2024 (JST, Reiwa 6) (Refresh)JapanWikipedia:WikiProject JapanTemplate:WikiProject JapanJapan-related articles Start This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible. Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by the Business and economy task force. This article is supported by the Tokyo task force. WikiProject Japan to do list: edit history watch purge Peer review: None A-class review: None Featured content candidates –  Articles: None Pictures: None Lists: None Good article nominations: Vinland Saga (TV series), Godzilla Minus One Add requested images to articles that need them. Pages for Deletion: Participate in Japan-related deletion discussions. Improve and expand Japan-related stubs. Create some requested articles. Help translate an article from the Japanese Wikipedia into English. Assess unassessed articles

Regarding the 'Multiple issues' I'm not really sure why this page is not pleasing to the WikiPedia standards? I am currently researching Atelier Bow-Wow for a book and the information here seems well researched, well written and unbiased. Probably you could say the author does not hate BowWow's work, but I wouldn't think it is falsely making them out to be anything better than what they are? I am not sure what are the 'Primary Sources' that are of concern? The publications referred to are all available to the public. Is Wikipedia worried that Atelier BowWow put this information up? I don't really think it is likely. 1000years (talk) 23:59, 10 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I'm just a random visitor, but the page is interesting and deserves to be here. The one thing that really needs to be done is inclusion of a few photos of the architecture being described. No pictures on a architect page is crazy!