Talk:Bani Na'im

Warning: active arbitration remedies The contentious topics procedure applies to this article. This article is related to the Arab–Israeli conflict, which is a contentious topic. Furthermore, the following rules apply when editing this article: You must be logged-in and extended-confirmed to edit or discuss this topic on any page (except for making edit requests, provided they are not disruptive) You may not make more than 1 revert within 24 hours on any edits related to this topic Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page. Further information The exceptions to the extended confirmed restriction are: Non-extended-confirmed editors may use the "Talk:" namespace only to make edit requests related to articles within the topic area, provided they are not disruptive. Non-extended-confirmed editors may not create new articles, but administrators may exercise discretion when deciding how to enforce this remedy on article creations. Deletion of new articles created by non-extended-confirmed editors is permitted but not required. With respect to the WP:1RR restriction: Clear vandalism of whatever origin may be reverted without restriction. Also, reverts made solely to enforce the extended confirmed restriction are not considered edit warring. Editors who violate this restriction may be blocked by any uninvolved administrator, even on a first offence. After being warned, contentious topics procedure can be used against any editor who repeatedly or seriously fails to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process. Contentious topic sanctions can include blocks, topic-bans, or other restrictions. Editors may report violations of these restrictions to the Arbitration enforcement noticeboard. If you are unsure if your edit is appropriate, discuss it here on this talk page first. When in doubt, don't revert!

	Bani Na'im has been listed as one of the Geography and places good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones Date Process Result December 26, 2011 Good article nominee Listed January 31, 2023 Good article reassessment Kept
Current status: Good article

This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Cities This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cities, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of cities, towns and various other settlements on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CitiesWikipedia:WikiProject CitiesTemplate:WikiProject CitiesWikiProject Cities articles Palestine Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Palestine, a team effort dedicated to building and maintaining comprehensive, informative and balanced articles related to the geographic Palestine region, the Palestinian people and the State of Palestine on Wikipedia. Join us by visiting the project page, where you can add your name to the list of members where you can contribute to the discussions.PalestineWikipedia:WikiProject PalestineTemplate:WikiProject PalestinePalestine-related articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

This review is transcluded from Talk:Bani Na'im/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Grandiose (talk · contribs) 20:01, 21 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I'll be conducting a full review shortly, but it looks promising. Grandiose (me, talk, contribs) 20:01, 21 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please have a look at the reference text and provide, at a minimum, an access date ("Full date when item was accessed") for web links, and correct any typographical errors (for example, incorrectly spaced brackets and other punctuation problems. Coverage and source usage are all fine, as is the copy quality of the main text. Grandiose (me, talk, contribs) 14:08, 24 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I added all the access dates for web links, formatted the refs with citation templates and fixed the grammatical errors that I could spot. --Al Ameer son (talk) 17:37, 24 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Two things: firstly, #1 has a typographical error. Secondly, I'm afraid that #16 will have to be replaced. Whilst Palestine Remembered may be suitable for the population, the pro-Palestine bias means that it is unsuitable for "Eyewitnesses claim al-Husayni himself was wounded and was evacuated to the government hospital in Hebron. In January 1939, British forces bombed a number of neighborhoods in the town for allegedly housing al-Husayni's fighters." Grandiose (me, talk, contribs) 17:58, 24 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed. I'll try to find another source backing the 1939 bombing and al-Husayni's hospitalization, but for now I'll remove the info. It isn't critical since the Arab revolt in Bani Na'im is still covered. --Al Ameer son (talk) 21:05, 24 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]