Talk:Blade PC

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Computing Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by Computer hardware task force (assessed as Low-importance).

I've added some pictures of the HP product, but I don't have access to any other vendor's photos. Please add if you have access.

There is a bit of text in the Description that says "Close up of two racks of blades PCs showing the density of 20 blade PCs per 3U enclosure" - was there supposed to be a picture with this?! —Preceding unsigned comment added by TetsuoTheRob (talk • contribs) 23:11, 17 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Someone marked this entry for 'speedy delition' because it was viewed as too promotional. My intent was to present an objective but breif history to include of the various vendors, and I did provide links to their pages. I beleive that everything I reported in the entry is true and factual. Clearly a number of other people have looked at this page and not found it so objectional. Let me suggest that if anyone disagrees with what is written that they edit it instead of deleting the catagory. Thanks... —Preceding unsigned comment added by AlandAd1 (talk • contribs) 13:10, 28 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

There are numerous links and references to sites with more detailed information. —Preceding unsigned comment added by AlandAd1 (talk • contribs) 15:58, 30 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

A new warning has been inserted into this entry that there are no citations or references. This is documentably incorrect. See the many links in the entry to various other web sites and other Wikipedia sites form which I have used and referenced in creating this entry. As as explain yourself, and give others the opportunity to do the same. Consider whether a dispute stems from different perspectives and look for ways to reach consensus. This can avoid misunderstandings and prevent problems from escalating. When others cast doubt on their own good faith, continue to assume good faith yourself where you can. Be careful to remain civil yourself, and if necessary follow dispute resolution processes rather than edit warring or attacking other editors."I certainly invite others to continue to strengthen this page, but I ask that various flags be fact-based and attempts be made to correct anything I have misstated rather than just delete. Thanks!